What kind of headphones do you wear?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


ThatGuyFromNukemHigh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Tromaville, New Jersey
Then you have to remember sound quality from the source, an MP3 by nature is going to lose a lot of the sound quality, so no matter how good your headphones are, you are still restricted unless you still walk around with a discman.

I got my pair of Sony's about 5 years ago, a $60 price tag and they sounded just as good as the Skullcandy set I got about a year earlier that cost me nearly twice as much, but I still use a Discman as it would take way too much time to get my CD collection over to MP3.

cds.jpg

That is 10 stacks of discs, and there is easily over 300 cds in total.
 

John McHenry

John McHenry
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
21,190
Reaction score
2,535
Points
113
Location
Ohio
Favorite Wrestler
dolphziggler2
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
brianpillman
Favorite Wrestler
shaneomac
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
while your right when comparing a mp3 to a record or cd that the sound quality is lower but that lower form is now the standard so it doesn't really matter because everything is being optimized to make the mp3 sound as good as possible.
 

ThatGuyFromNukemHigh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Tromaville, New Jersey
But no matter how much they improve the MP3, it will still be a computer file. Records & cds use continuous information, where the MP3 relies on chunks of information received at certain times, this results in a loss of quality, even if it is only a few nanoseconds that it actually effects.

I cant remember the file names, but bands like Nine Inch Nails used a "lose less" audio file for their digital downloads. The quality is slightly better than that of an MP3, but still not up to par with the physical medium.
 

John McHenry

John McHenry
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
21,190
Reaction score
2,535
Points
113
Location
Ohio
Favorite Wrestler
dolphziggler2
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
brianpillman
Favorite Wrestler
shaneomac
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
Loss less probably cda which is what you get on a store bought CD.
 

ThatGuyFromNukemHigh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Tromaville, New Jersey
Ghosts did not sound as good on a burnt disc as it did on the physical, but since the first disc was given away for free before the 2 disc set was released in physical form I decided it would be best to check out the instrumental NIN before buying it. Considering I thought With Teeth sucked ass after running out to get it first day.
 

We Are Legion

║▌║█║▌||| ║▌║▌█ ║█║║▌||
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
4,452
Reaction score
92
Points
53
Location
Montreal, QC
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
Favorite Wrestler
ricflair
Favorite Wrestler
jbl2
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Okay yeah obviously an expensive stereo system sounds a lot better than headphones, everyone knows that. That isn't the point because it isn't very practical to carry around two giant speakers, 3 satellites, and 50-pound subwoofer strapped to your back everywhere you go. God forbid some of us actually leave the house a lot and like to have quality sound with our portable devices.

And honestly, I don't see how anyone who has actually worn Beats and listened to them with a quality sound source (which makes a big difference) can say they sound like cheap headphones. They don't. They handle bass like a boss to the point they literally vibrate your head on low volume and sound crystal clear. Yeah right, point me towards the $10 headphones you speak of that do that. Most headphones cut out when using a bass boost or just sound crunchy as fuck when there's too much of it. You never have that problem with Beats.

They're expensive but well worth it if you go on long bike rides and walks like I do or commute on public transit a lot.
 

SAIYANS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
16,529
Reaction score
196
Points
63
Age
35
Favorite Wrestler
batista2
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
johncena
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
Okay yeah obviously an expensive stereo system sounds a lot better than headphones, everyone knows that. That isn't the point because it isn't very practical to carry around two giant speakers, 3 satellites, and 50-pound subwoofer strapped to your back everywhere you go. God forbid some of us actually leave the house a lot and like to have quality sound with our portable devices.

And honestly, I don't see how anyone who has actually worn Beats and listened to them with a quality sound source (which makes a big difference) can say they sound like cheap headphones. They don't. They handle bass like a boss to the point they literally vibrate your head on low volume and sound crystal clear. Yeah right, point me towards the $10 headphones you speak of that do that. Most headphones cut out when using a bass boost or just sound crunchy as fuck when there's too much of it. You never have that problem with Beats.

They're expensive but well worth it if you go on long bike rides and walks like I do or commute on public transit a lot.
You answered your own question. Some people don't know ibeats from urbeats. They have to actually read which headphones go with what to get the best sound

What's wrong with Luda's soul ones exactly?
They were flimsy and the base sounded muffled, to me anyhow
 

Slim

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
6,305
Reaction score
101
Points
63
Location
In your girl's closet
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
newageoutlaws
Favorite Wrestler
tara
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
Favorite Wrestler
wyattfamily
Well just because they sound the same to you doesn't mean they sound the same to everyone else. Some can hear better than others. And it depends on the type of music and what you are actually listening for or if you know what to even listen for. If the eq settings are set right or not. So many things can go into it... and perhaps that's why when you listen to some headphones that are cheap they "sound the same."

But goodness... I still consider it asinine when you have NEVER even listened to the headphones and yet want to compare them to some cheap ass 10 dollar headphones and think people want to wear them cause they are "cool and popular." Yeah I'm lookin at you Tappy. If you don't understand and haven't experienced them then shut up about it. I've tried the cheap 10 dollar headphones, the 20 dollar, 5 dollar, 50 dollar, and beats. Beats tops them all. Hands down.
 

Tapout

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
2,537
Reaction score
65
Points
48
Location
San Diego
Favorite Wrestler
jericho
Favorite Wrestler
evanbourne
Favorite Wrestler
shawnmichaels
Favorite Wrestler
romanreigns
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk5
When did I ever say I've never listened to music through Beats? Most of my friends have them, so I have many times before. You said that people hear differently. I'm one of those people. I've had surgery on my ears multiple times. To me, Beats sound the same as any other headphones. Even if there was a difference, I would rather miss out on a little base, then miss out on 200 dollars.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
757
Reaction score
8
Points
18
Location
India
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
eddieguerrero
Favorite Wrestler
randyorton
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk
Favorite Wrestler
evolution
Favorite Wrestler
brocklesnar
I used to have an entry level Sennheiser...HD 2xx something. I forgot. Now I'm just using a pair of Creative GW 2.0s, cannot go for one of those 300$ noisy PC speaker systems with subwoofer in an apartment, my neighbors are really annoying human beings when it comes to loud noises.

I am planning on picking up those Sony Pulse Wireless headset though, it's compatible with pretty much everything I would ever use and fits my needs perfectly.

I'm too cheap to buy it in a showroom though, Indian prices are ridiculously inflated, I have some *ahem* contacts who can get it for me at lower prices. :side:
 

ThatGuyFromNukemHigh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
68
Points
48
Location
Tromaville, New Jersey
Well just because they sound the same to you doesn't mean they sound the same to everyone else. Some can hear better than others. And it depends on the type of music and what you are actually listening for or if you know what to even listen for. If the eq settings are set right or not. So many things can go into it... and perhaps that's why when you listen to some headphones that are cheap they "sound the same."

But goodness... I still consider it asinine when you have NEVER even listened to the headphones and yet want to compare them to some cheap ass 10 dollar headphones and think people want to wear them cause they are "cool and popular." Yeah I'm lookin at you Tappy. If you don't understand and haven't experienced them then shut up about it. I've tried the cheap 10 dollar headphones, the 20 dollar, 5 dollar, 50 dollar, and beats. Beats tops them all. Hands down.

Oh yes great and powerful one, I don't know how to listen to music. ffs get your head out of your ass, Dre needed a new cash cow since the MP3 is killing his revenue, but regardless Headphones will still sell until they can transmit the songs directly into our brains.

You are paying for the name on the headphones, Joe Shmoe Nobody could have released a pair that have the exact same specs, the exact same sound quality, and yet would have a lower price point because his name is not as marketable as Dr. Dre. You can try to deny it all you want, but that's the truth about marketing. It is why in the 90's McFarlane Toys could sell action figures for over $20, when Neca, and other companies were making them with the same care & attention to detail, but being an artist for Spider-Man, Batman, & the creator of Spawn(the big 3 at the time), he was more marketable than any of the other companies, and Todd rarely worked on the sculpts.

I would never buy a cheap ass set of headphones, unless I am on the go and mine busted and I just want a quick replacement until I can get to an actual store. But there is also a reason Sony has been the most trusted name in audio technology for the past 30+ years.

Well just because they sound the same to you doesn't mean they sound the same to everyone else. Some can hear better than others. And it depends on the type of music and what you are actually listening for or if you know what to even listen for. If the eq settings are set right or not. So many things can go into it... and perhaps that's why when you listen to some headphones that are cheap they "sound the same."

But goodness... I still consider it asinine when you have NEVER even listened to the headphones and yet want to compare them to some cheap ass 10 dollar headphones and think people want to wear them cause they are "cool and popular." Yeah I'm lookin at you Tappy. If you don't understand and haven't experienced them then shut up about it. I've tried the cheap 10 dollar headphones, the 20 dollar, 5 dollar, 50 dollar, and beats. Beats tops them all. Hands down.

Oh yes great and powerful one, I don't know how to listen to music. ffs get your head out of your ass, Dre needed a new cash cow since the MP3 is killing his revenue, but regardless Headphones will still sell until they can transmit the songs directly into our brains.

You are paying for the name on the headphones, Joe Shmoe Nobody could have released a pair that have the exact same specs, the exact same sound quality, and yet would have a lower price point because his name is not as marketable as Dr. Dre. You can try to deny it all you want, but that's the truth about marketing. It is why in the 90's McFarlane Toys could sell action figures for over $20, when Neca, and other companies were making them with the same care & attention to detail, but being an artist for Spider-Man, Batman, & the creator of Spawn(the big 3 at the time), he was more marketable than any of the other companies, and Todd rarely worked on the sculpts.

I would never buy a cheap ass set of headphones, unless I am on the go and mine busted and I just want a quick replacement until I can get to an actual store. But there is also a reason Sony has been the most trusted name in audio technology for the past 30+ years.
 

Kiffy Lube

Girls Just Wanna Have Fun
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Messages
80,150
Reaction score
13,528
Points
248
Age
36
Location
The Large House, Arizona
Favorite Wrestler
lowki
Favorite Wrestler
lowki
Favorite Wrestler
lowki
Favorite Wrestler
lowki
Favorite Wrestler
lowki
Favorite Wrestler
lowki
I haven't used straight up headphones or earbuds for a CD Player in awhile. If I still took things like public transportation, I'd probably keep them handy. Usually when I'm listening to music it's on my amazing speakers for my home entertainment system, the bangin' system I have in my car or at a friend's with a similar get up. I had someone I work with buy me some great studio headphones, I can't remember what brand they were off the top of my head but they were apart of some like $1,000 recording kit but you know those are strictly for recording.

Edit: StudioOne*
 
Last edited:

We Are Legion

║▌║█║▌||| ║▌║▌█ ║█║║▌||
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
4,452
Reaction score
92
Points
53
Location
Montreal, QC
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
Favorite Wrestler
ricflair
Favorite Wrestler
jbl2
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Well just because they sound the same to you doesn't mean they sound the same to everyone else. Some can hear better than others. And it depends on the type of music and what you are actually listening for or if you know what to even listen for. If the eq settings are set right or not. So many things can go into it... and perhaps that's why when you listen to some headphones that are cheap they "sound the same."

But goodness... I still consider it asinine when you have NEVER even listened to the headphones and yet want to compare them to some cheap ass 10 dollar headphones and think people want to wear them cause they are "cool and popular." Yeah I'm lookin at you Tappy. If you don't understand and haven't experienced them then shut up about it. I've tried the cheap 10 dollar headphones, the 20 dollar, 5 dollar, 50 dollar, and beats. Beats tops them all. Hands down.
That last sentence couldn't be any more true. I would only recommend ear buds if you're working out or doing things that require lots of head movement and tilting. But even the Sony brands aren't going to give you great sound. The clarity might definitely be there, but no ear buds can handle heavy bass, it's just not possible. Most $100-$150 headphones can't either, which is why I will actually concede that you are wasting your money if you don't go the whole distance and swing for the expensive Beats or a similar brand that requires power.

The only other headphones I used that were on Beats' level were these:

30106d1344060362-cm-storm-sirus-cm-storm-sirus.jpg


The CM Storm Siris sounded great and were actually $100 cheaper, but they require installation and plug-in's on your computer to work properly and also draw power from your computer through a USB cord. And there's a number of other reasons they're not practical for portable devices, even though you could use them that way. As I said, they don't sound anything like they do on your computer without a USB connection and the plug-in's and they're just too freaking HUGE to take with you. Plus, you sort of look like a nerd with that microphone attached to it.

Turtle Beach is another awesome brand for PC headphones, but their best editions are just as expensive as Beats and they're equally unpractical for portable devices for the same reasons.

When did I ever say I've never listened to music through Beats? Most of my friends have them, so I have many times before. You said that people hear differently. I'm one of those people. I've had surgery on my ears multiple times. To me, Beats sound the same as any other headphones. Even if there was a difference, I would rather miss out on a little base, then miss out on 200 dollars.
Okay I'm seriously not trying to be rude or insult you whatsoever and I really want to make that clear up front, but if you're partially tone-deaf, why exactly are you criticizing them? I'm just saying because if I was color blind, I wouldn't be nit-picking the color palettes of renaissance paintings because obviously they would look much different to me than they do to most people. And I don't know what type of Beats headphones your friends have, but no headphones that don't require batteries or draw power from an external device through a separate cable can possibly compete with Studio Beats. It's just not possible. They need power for a reason and they're popular for a reason. I listen to mostly electronic music, do you really think I give a shit about Dr. Dre?

The one thing that hip hop and electronica have in common though is that they're both extremely low-end oriented. That's why you pay extra for Beats. It's not about how clear they sound, it's about feeling the low end. The same reason your pay extra for a 500-watt subwoofer on your stereo as opposed to a bullshit Radio Shack 30-watt sub is the same reason you buy Beats over earbuds or cheap headphones. That might not sound like a big deal to you, but people that are really into those types of music keep coming back because they love the bass. Especially electronic music because I can positively guarantee you it isn't for the lyrics (or lack thereof).

Though I will say, when I was mostly into rock and heavy metal as a teenager, I didn't really give a shit about things like this. Rock isn't very bass-driven and probably not a genre you would need Beats to appreciate more. But if it's Industrial music or a band that uses a lot of synthetic percussion (like Spineshank), then you would clearly notice the difference on Beats.

I used to have an entry level Sennheiser...HD 2xx something. I forgot. Now I'm just using a pair of Creative GW 2.0s, cannot go for one of those 300$ noisy PC speaker systems with subwoofer in an apartment, my neighbors are really annoying human beings when it comes to loud noises.

I am planning on picking up those Sony Pulse Wireless headset though, it's compatible with pretty much everything I would ever use and fits my needs perfectly.

I'm too cheap to buy it in a showroom though, Indian prices are ridiculously inflated, I have some *ahem* contacts who can get it for me at lower prices. :side:
Sennheiser is good. I'm not a fan of the way they look and the ones I played with didn't fold up or stow away easily, but as far as the sound goes, they're pretty good headphones.
 

Slim

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
6,305
Reaction score
101
Points
63
Location
In your girl's closet
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
newageoutlaws
Favorite Wrestler
tara
Favorite Wrestler
trishstratus
Favorite Wrestler
wyattfamily
Oh yes great and powerful one, I don't know how to listen to music. ffs get your head out of your ass, Dre needed a new cash cow since the MP3 is killing his revenue, but regardless Headphones will still sell until they can transmit the songs directly into our brains.

You are paying for the name on the headphones, Joe Shmoe Nobody could have released a pair that have the exact same specs, the exact same sound quality, and yet would have a lower price point because his name is not as marketable as Dr. Dre. You can try to deny it all you want, but that's the truth about marketing. It is why in the 90's McFarlane Toys could sell action figures for over $20, when Neca, and other companies were making them with the same care & attention to detail, but being an artist for Spider-Man, Batman, & the creator of Spawn(the big 3 at the time), he was more marketable than any of the other companies, and Todd rarely worked on the sculpts.

I would never buy a cheap ass set of headphones, unless I am on the go and mine busted and I just want a quick replacement until I can get to an actual store. But there is also a reason Sony has been the most trusted name in audio technology for the past 30+ years.



Oh yes great and powerful one, I don't know how to listen to music. ffs get your head out of your ass, Dre needed a new cash cow since the MP3 is killing his revenue, but regardless Headphones will still sell until they can transmit the songs directly into our brains.

You are paying for the name on the headphones, Joe Shmoe Nobody could have released a pair that have the exact same specs, the exact same sound quality, and yet would have a lower price point because his name is not as marketable as Dr. Dre. You can try to deny it all you want, but that's the truth about marketing. It is why in the 90's McFarlane Toys could sell action figures for over $20, when Neca, and other companies were making them with the same care & attention to detail, but being an artist for Spider-Man, Batman, & the creator of Spawn(the big 3 at the time), he was more marketable than any of the other companies, and Todd rarely worked on the sculpts.

I would never buy a cheap ass set of headphones, unless I am on the go and mine busted and I just want a quick replacement until I can get to an actual store. But there is also a reason Sony has been the most trusted name in audio technology for the past 30+ years.

Yeah I'm buying these headphones because they have Dr. Dre's name on them. That is precisely the only reason I am buying them. There couldn't be any other reason besides that. Not that I haven't tried every other damn brand out there. Different priced headphones which I stated before. Oh no... I simply say Dr. Dre beats headphones are the best because they are the most expensive and have his name on them

shut up.