what is a hipster
- Thread starter Tgmiveld
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
- Messages
- 31,583
- Reaction score
- 5,877
- Points
- 28
- Age
- 30
- Location
- The United States of Ambrose
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
i know you dont want to believe thst is me in the photo, as i am decent looking guy
i know that is hard for you to belive due to your biasedness against me
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,334
- Reaction score
- 1,703
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 37
In the real world, the term 'Hipster' is meant to describe someone who says or does things different from the majority for no other reason than for the sake of being different (or "hip", hence the term "hipster.")
But the way I hear the word often used (especially in the world of the interweb), it's usually intended to describe someone who dares to disagree with the majority on something (either on a specific forum, or with society in general) and thus getting branded the negative term "hipster" for doing so, because fuck forbid somebody actually likes something or arrives to a conclusion on something that happens to differ from the majority, right? In this context, the term is typically just an easy and convenient way to dismiss someone's feelings or arguments on something without having to actually engage them in why they feel or see something a particular way. Accusing someone of being a "troll" (and thus, allowing you to justify dismissing them right out of hand) for taking the opposite view of whatever the consensus is on a particular topic works in a similar way.
I mean, after all, if history has shown us anything, it's that the majority is always right, eh? (I'm being snarky, of course - history has often shown us just the opposite.)
But the way I hear the word often used (especially in the world of the interweb), it's usually intended to describe someone who dares to disagree with the majority on something (either on a specific forum, or with society in general) and thus getting branded the negative term "hipster" for doing so, because fuck forbid somebody actually likes something or arrives to a conclusion on something that happens to differ from the majority, right? In this context, the term is typically just an easy and convenient way to dismiss someone's feelings or arguments on something without having to actually engage them in why they feel or see something a particular way. Accusing someone of being a "troll" (and thus, allowing you to justify dismissing them right out of hand) for taking the opposite view of whatever the consensus is on a particular topic works in a similar way.
I mean, after all, if history has shown us anything, it's that the majority is always right, eh? (I'm being snarky, of course - history has often shown us just the opposite.)
Even if that was you, the guy looks like shit, as if he had a Rod up his ass. I'm not biased. I'm just not stupid enough to believe your drivel
the guy looks like shit?
you have to be trolling lad. i once had 3 stunners come on to me in 1 night. how do i look like shit