What Brock makes per match....

[Jay-Ashley]

Why do you disagree?

Look dude we can keep this argument going back forth, but it will be no use. You won't see my point of view and I won't see yours and eventually one of us will get heated and it will all go down hill from there. Okay? So I am politely agreeing to disagree, and come to a draw/truce.

 

[Jacob Fox]

Eh, Im not a huge fan of Brock having the belt. Though I somewhat understand since he is a complete monster. I what about a small percentage of that tho please.

I am almost (not completely) rooting for Roman in the next match. I just want this rivalry to be done with. Once Roman has the belt, I am sure he's not going to hold it for a long time since it bounces around a lot more than it used to. Also, it would be a little irritating if Lesnar reigns (pun intended) longer than CM Punk since at least Punk wrestled on a regular basis, whether you liked him or not.

 

[Redboy123@]

Look dude we can keep this argument going back forth, but it will be no use. You won't see my point of view and I won't see yours and eventually one of us will get heated and it will all go down hill from there. Okay? So I am politely agreeing to disagree, and come to a draw/truce.

Whoa dude didn't know this could get heated. I'm pretty chill just wanted to know more about your POV. Thought we were having a conversation since ya know its a forum...

 

[Nikki Nitro]

Fox Sports is reporting that Brock Lesnar’s new WWE deal includes a massive $637,000 per match. Lesnar also reportedly earns $127,000 for each television appearance, as well as 6% from all merchandise sales. Unlike Lesnar’s last deal, the WWE will be able to use Lesnar’s likeness for merchandising, which nets The Beast another $637,000 per year. Brock Lesnar’s next $637,000 bout will be at The Greatest Royal Rumble in a Steel Cage Match against Roman Reigns.

source

Can I have 10% of that? lease:

:

WOWZA!

 

[Jay-Ashley]

Whoa dude didn't know this could get heated. I'm pretty chill just wanted to know more about your POV. Thought we were having a conversation since ya know its a forum...

It's in the nature of arguments that one person will get heated, it always happens whether initial or not. I have yet been in or seen an argument where one person doesn't explode. I am not getting heated one bit in fact quite the opposite, but we will end just going back forth neither person seeing the other one's view or anything and thus beating a dead horse and more.

 

[Jacob Fox]

Look dude we can keep this argument going back forth, but it will be no use. You won't see my point of view and I won't see yours and eventually one of us will get heated and it will all go down hill from there. Okay? So I am politely agreeing to disagree, and come to a draw/truce.

Whoa dude didn't know this could get heated. I'm pretty chill just wanted to know more about your POV. Thought we were having a conversation since ya know its a forum...

I think you guys are having a reasonable discourse. I understand ending the disagreement if you don't want it to get heated, but as of now you both seem to be civil

 

[Redboy123@]

It's in the nature of arguments that one person will get heated, it always happens whether initial or not. I have yet been in or seen an argument where one person doesn't explode. I am not getting heated one bit in fact quite the opposite, but we will end just going back forth neither person seeing the other one's view or anything and thus beating a dead horse and more.

This isn't a argument its a conversation with conflicting views. A debate doesn't have to be heated. But whatever I suppose

 

[Jay-Ashley]

I think you guys are having a reasonable discourse. I understand ending the disagreement if you don't want it to get heated, but as of now you both seem to be civil

Right as of right now it is civil, but that can all change to be fair.

This isn't a argument its a conversation with conflicting views. A debate doesn't have to be heated. But whatever I suppose

You are right we both have conflicting views, but the conversation won't go anywhere because I won't move on my opinion and neither would you. So it is whatever I suppose.

 

[Redboy123@]

You are right we both have conflicting views, but the conversation won't go anywhere because I won't move on my opinion and neither would you. So it is whatever I suppose.

I've been known to change my mind

 

[The Sheik]

Why would this guy ever leave WWE? He has it made in this company.

 

[Jay-Ashley]

I've been known to change my mind

Okay here I will give my view and you will give yours and then we go our separate ways, okie dokie.

I believe if you work the hardest then you should get paid more. Now I will explain it that in WWE.

Take Roman Regins. He is there almost if not every night on RAW comes out and does his job whether it be to do a promo, to be in a match, or whatever. He is there almost every single night thus I believe he should get paid more then Brock who shows up whenever and hardly defends the belt. Also, even though almost everyone hates Roman at least when he was a champion of any sort he defended his belt every night and at every RAW PPV, unlike Brock.

Another example would be The Miz. He made the Intercontinental Championship more relevant than the Universal Champion. He made a mid-card belt more vulnerable then the Universal and that is saying something

Also, I dislike the fact that a part timer is a champion because it makes that belt irrelevant and makes little to no sense while you have guys who constantly go out there every week and wrestle. It doesn't matter if it is Brock Lesnar or Bill Goldberg putting a belt on a part timer is a dumb move.

I do understand Brock is a huge draw, I can understand why people like him, even though I personally hate the guy, and some see he should get more money, but I guess I have an older way seeing it. I also understand a Champion and main event stars, for a lack of better words should get more then jobbers because I agree with that. Paying a jobber the same amount as one of your huge stars is dumb as well, sorry Ryback.

Once again, I see it as if you are there everyday, do your job, and work hard than you should get paid more then someone who doesn't.

Now that you see and maybe understand my view. I will wait for yours and we shall both move on, amigo.

 

[Solid Snake]

I feel like part of the reason he gets as much as he does is because Vince is using his real name. He is paying to use it to market his company. Brock has value outside of WWE as well. I don't think it is fair that he earns as much as he does in comparison to the people on the roster who have to do regular shows, PPVs, house shows, and guest appearances but Brock is Brock. I read he made 12 million last year.

The Undertaker was making 2 million a year to wrestle one match for awhile. This included maybe 4 or 5 appearances before said match. Cena made somewhere around 8 million last year as a part timer so I would guess he made around 16 million when he was a full timer.

And for perspective that these earnings make little to no sense, Kevin Dunn makes about 4.8 million a year, while AJ Styles made 2.4 million last year.

I think there is more to this than the amount of hours you put in is what I am saying.

 

[Redboy123@]

Okay here I will give my view and you will give yours and then we go our separate ways, okie dokie.

I believe if you work the hardest then you should get paid more. Now I will explain it that in WWE.

Take Roman Regins. He is there almost if not every night on RAW comes out and does his job whether it be to do a promo, to be in a match, or whatever. He is there almost every single night thus I believe he should get paid more then Brock who shows up whenever and hardly defends the belt. Also, even though almost everyone hates Roman at least when he was a champion of any sort he defended his belt every night and at every RAW PPV, unlike Brock.

Another example would be The Miz. He made the Intercontinental Championship more relevant than the Universal Champion. He made a mid-card belt more vulnerable then the Universal and that is saying something

Also, I dislike the fact that a part timer is a champion because it makes that belt irrelevant and makes little to no sense while you have guys who constantly go out there every week and wrestle. It doesn't matter if it is Brock Lesnar or Bill Goldberg putting a belt on a part timer is a dumb move.

I do understand Brock is a huge draw, I can understand why people like him, even though I personally hate the guy, and some see he should get more money, but I guess I have an older way seeing it. I also understand a Champion and main event stars, for a lack of better words should get more then jobbers because I agree with that. Paying a jobber the same amount as one of your huge stars is dumb as well, sorry Ryback.

Once again, I see it as if you are there everyday, do your job, and work hard than you should get paid more then someone who doesn't.

Now that you see and maybe understand my view. I will wait for yours and we shall both move on, amigo.

I totally understand your opinion. If I was a business owner I would love to pay the hardest working bumble bee the most money. But if that Bumble Bee is not making that much honey then where am I going to get the money from to pay that salary? Am I going to use the money to pay that bees salary from the revenue generated from a Bee that makes more honey.? Logistically it doesn't work.

 

[Jay-Ashley]

And for perspective that these earnings make little to no sense, Kevin Dunn makes about 4.8 million a year, while AJ Styles made 2.4 million last year.

And yet Kevin Dunn refuses to get his teeth worked on...

 

[Solid Snake]

And yet Kevin Dunn refuses to get his teeth worked on...

He is secure with himself, can't hate on that.