Was Heyman right last night?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
He mentioned how we all want the Attitude Era back, and edgy television, but when we got that (the edgy part) with the Lawler story it received a lot of backlash from the casuals AND the smarks, so is he right? Has mainstream media and such affected how the fans perceive such storylines?
 

Jonathan

Champion
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
17,031
Reaction score
2,969
Points
113
Right and wrong.

Right in a sense that everyone went apeshit about the whole thing, but he's wrong because the angles in the attitude era weren't mocking people's death (even if he only died for 20 minutes) - So.... yes and no.
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
Jonathan said:
Right and wrong.

Right in a sense that everyone went apeshit about the whole thing, but he's wrong because the angles in the attitude era weren't mocking people's death (even if he only died for 20 minutes) - So.... yes and no.

Big Boss Man dragging Big Show's dad's coffin around after his car says hello.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rysenberg

Rysenberg

Legend
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
10,893
Reaction score
1,241
Points
0
Location
United Scotland of Ambrose
Jonathan said:
Right and wrong.

Right in a sense that everyone went apeshit about the whole thing, but he's wrong because the angles in the attitude era weren't mocking people's death (even if he only died for 20 minutes) - So.... yes and no.

Mocking somebodies heart attack with their consent is a lot better than promoting things like Necrophilia.

Good shout Stop lol ^
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Jonathan said:
Right and wrong.

Right in a sense that everyone went apeshit about the whole thing, but he's wrong because the angles in the attitude era weren't mocking people's death (even if he only died for 20 minutes) - So.... yes and no.

Do you think the audience in the AE would have complained like babies if this angle happened back then? Of course not.
 

Mustafar Reginald

The Lunatic Fringe
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,325
Reaction score
628
Points
0
Is Heyman ever wrong?

Crayo said:
Jonathan said:
Right and wrong.

Right in a sense that everyone went apeshit about the whole thing, but he's wrong because the angles in the attitude era weren't mocking people's death (even if he only died for 20 minutes) - So.... yes and no.


Do you think the audience in the AE would have complained like babies if this angle happened back then? Of course not.

Yeah exactly. Not to mention, I feel people who really complain about it completely missed the point of Foley's portion of the segment. People who bash the segment saying it was wrong, in bad taste, and crossing all kinds of lines are just reiterating everything Foley said and normally not even a fourth as well. I mean, I can understand the argument against the angle had Foley's promo been left out, but his inclusion and delivery did nothing but highlight how terrible what Punk & Heyman just did.
 

Cloud

Champion
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
10,486
Reaction score
1,562
Points
118
Age
40
Heyman was correct because as much as ppl are all for the AE coming back. Those same ppl take kids to the show and as soon as something gets a bit risque or on the edge they dont like it as they deem it inappropriate for the kids.

I mean the AE did the vast majority of us on here no harm watching as kids. But as computer games and films show the media in certain circumstances need scapegoats and use games like GTA and films etc as such. The WWE if it went to overboard and back to the AE even with a TV-14 rating would still risk the wrath of the media if anything happened that could be related to wrestling. Plus the same parents calling for the AE return and an edgier product would be first in line supporting the media in the moral outrage.
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
Heyman touched on so many points about what is wrong with fans today that it isn't even funny
 

True Warrior

Jobber
Joined
Nov 11, 2012
Messages
198
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Age
27
I was thinking Attitude Era 2 was gonna start at RAW 1000 since they talked about a new era but hopefully Attitude Era 2 starts 2013.
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
True Warrior said:
I was thinking Attitude Era 2 was gonna start at RAW 1000 since they talked about a new era but hopefully Attitude Era 2 starts 2013.

There won't be an attitude era 2 in my opinion. Recreating something does not guarantee success. More likely then not they would fail. They should instead work forward towards something new and exiting.