Vince McMahon Sex Trafficking / Resignation Mega Thread

[Comrade Khan]

Yeah I feel pretty horrible for Nikki, Brie and their mum

 

[Chris]

Voluntarily giving the most stereotypical evil statements to try and defend yourself against Wrestlenomics of all people (no offense guys but you're not the wall street journal) is actually a low I didn't expect here

 

[Comrade Khan]

Voluntarily giving the most stereotypical evil statements to try and defend yourself against Wrestlenomics of all people (no offense guys but you're not the wall street journal) is actually a low I didn't expect here

do you think we will get a aew backstage story or slowdrip from brit mjf within 6 hours to deflect or is this too small a drop in the bucket /s (but not really /s sadly)

 

[Chris]

Dr. Carlon Colker files for discovery against Janel Grant, possibly preparing for defamation suit - Wrestlenomics

Dr. Colker’s Peak Wellness clinic files petition seeking evidence from Janel Grant for alleged defamation and emotional distress, a precursor to a potential defamation lawsuit.

wrestlenomics.com

Dr. Carlon Colker and his clinic, Peak Wellness, have filed a petition seeking evidence from Janel Grant. The complaint states that Colker believes obtaining information from Grant will give him the basis for “defamation, tortious interference with business relations, and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress”.

Colker’s attorneys pointed to the media attention garnered by Grant’s earlier petition against Colker for medical records as the source of alleged defamation. In that petition, Grant’s attorneys claimed that Colker refused to explain to her the substance of pills and I.V. infusions she was given at Colker’s clinic in Greenwich, Conn. Grant says she was directed by Vince McMahon to seek treatment at the clinic. The petition sought to obtain evidence to support her federal lawsuit against McMahon, WWE, and Laurinaitis.

“Grant is engaging in a smear campaign against [Colker and Peak Wellness] in order to bolster her well-publicized allegations concerning alleged sex trafficking and sexual assault,” the complaint filed on Tuesday in Connecticut Superior Court states.

Colker’s attorneys deny Grant’s allegation that he refused to explain treatments to her. He says that there’s “undisputable and documented evidence to the contrary that Dr. Colker always advised and consulted in advance with Grant concerning any specific medications she was prescribed.”

Colker’s complaint says, “Grant’s claim that Dr. Colker gave her ‘pushback’ simply because she inquired as to the specifics of what vitamins she was provided, is recklessly and harmfully false.”

The filing may be read as a precursor to a defamation lawsuit. It claims Grant made “material misstatements and patent lies” about Colker and his clinic, which “continue to have a devastating, and potentially long-lasting effect on [Colker and Peak Wellness’s] ability to continue practicing at the high-level which they have painstakingly earned,” and that the harm they’ve suffered is “perhaps incalculable… but well over tens of millions of dollars.”

Grant’s petition filed in July obtained “immediate, widespread news coverage of what would ordinarily be a bland and un-noteworthy request for a bill of discovery,” Colker’s petition states.

Colker and Peak Wellness are not defendants in the federal lawsuit Grant filed in January, in which she alleges sex trafficking and sexual assault while under the control of McMahon.

Colker’s complaint claims he and his clinic are not subjects of any investigation involving the Justice Department. Reportedly, the Justice Department is investigating allegations made against McMahon of sex trafficking and sexual assault.

Attaching a copy of her federal lawsuit, with its graphic descriptions of sexual assault, to her petition against the doctor, Colker’s complaint says, is “a blatant attempt to besmirch the good name and reputation of Dr. Colker and Peak Wellness.”

Colker’s attorneys say that Grant’s petition against him “took the unprecedented step to flout the Federal Court Order” that put the federal lawsuit on hold, pending the federal investigation.

McMahon also argues that Grant has violated the stay on her lawsuit by petitioning Colker. But yesterday, the judge ruled that her action, which is in Connecticut state court, doesn’t violate the court-ordered stay on the federal case.

“Federal district courts do not ordinarily regulate or sit in review of proceedings in state courts, and the Court’s stay order did not purport to extend to any state court proceedings,” Judge Jeffrey Meyer wrote in his ruling.

McMahon’s attorney, Jessica Taub Rosenberg, however, told Wrestlenomics in a statement on Wednesday that they still intend to prevent Grant from obtaining evidence through her petition.

“Ms. Grant’s attempt to seek discovery in state court despite a stay in federal court exemplifies her consistently deceitful behavior and lack of integrity;” Rosenberg said, “we will, per the Federal Court’s order, continue to pursue a court order to stop her.”

Grant’s attorney, Ann Callis, also provided a comment to us on Wednesday.

“The court sided with Janel and against McMahon in confirming she was within her right to seek her own medical records and data from Dr. Carlon Colker of Peak Wellness.” Callis said. “It is perplexing, but on brand to file an attack against a woman formerly in his care.”

Colker’s petition is seeking records from Grant’s phone providers, emails, and any social media sites Grant or her representatives used, as well as communications with news outlets. Colker is also seeking documents and communications related to Colker’s treatment of her. He’s also seeking to depose Grant at his attorney’s offices.

Colker is represented by lawyers from Verrill Dana LLP in Westport, Conn. We contacted his lawyers for this report, who declined to give any additional comments.

 

[Chris]

You'd think if they didn't do anything wrong with her care then they wouldnt have an issue releasing her records to her, but maybe the doctor who's famous for pushing fake supplements has a point here guys idk I'm not lawyer

 

[Grimoire Lenin]

Hopefully his business gets investigated next.

 

[Chris]

https://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=28060974

“In a desperate and brazen attempt to silence a former patient investigating wrongdoing related to her medical care, Dr. Colker and his practice, Peak Wellness, filed this vexatious bill of discovery. Dr. Colker and Peak Wellness hope to intimidate Ms. Grant into dropping her own pre- action discovery petition against them, in which she seeks her own medical records and related documentation."

“Dr. Colker stonewalled Ms. Grant’s repeated records requests for months until she filed a Bill of Discovery against him to gain access to her own medical records and documentation related to her medical care.”

“Instead of complying, Dr. Colker responded with this frivolous and retaliatory bill of discovery. Dr. Colker and Peak Wellness brought this action for an improper purpose, to intimidate and harass a former patient for daring to seek her own patient records. This action should be stricken and dismissed in its entirety with costs and attorneys’ fees awarded in favor of Ms. Grant.”

“The Colker Bill of Discovery identifies three claims Dr. Colker proposes to investigate: defamation, tortious interference with business relations, and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress.”

“These tort claims cannot be predicated on privileged statements made in court, which are absolutely protected under the litigation privilege, or on press statements or news articles relating to those pleadings, which are protected by the fair report privilege. Because Plaintiffs plead only statements contained in or related to court pleadings, there is no probable cause to support their Bill of Discovery. Moreover, Plaintiffs’ purported claims constitute an illegal attempt to chill Ms. Grant from speaking out about her treatment at the practice, and must be dismissed under Connecticut’s Anti-SLAPP statute as an impermissible infringement in her exercise of free speech related to a matter of public health and concern.”

“Even if they had plead probable cause—which they did not—the Colker Bill of Discovery must be stricken because it was filed in bad faith. Connecticut law established the bill of discovery as an equitable remedy. Where a plaintiff seeks equitable relief, he must show that his conduct has been fair, equitable and honest as to the controversy in issue. Dr. Colker and Peak Wellness cannot meet this burden. Dr. Colker participated in the mistreatment of Plaintiff by her former employers, Vince McMahon and the World Wrestling Entertainment.”

“Then, in a move calculated to cause Ms. Grant extreme emotional distress, Plaintiffs sent a marshal to effect personal service of this complaint on Ms. Grant at her home, despite knowing she was represented by counsel. Finally, Plaintiffs returned their complaint to this court after the District of Connecticut ruled that the Grant Bill of Discovery did not violate the temporary stay of her Federal Action. Plaintiffs made no effort to correct their false claim to the contrary before or after filing—instead, they rushed to the courthouse to return this complaint and, upon information and belief, leaked a copy to the press. Dr. Colker and Peak Wellness’ unclean hands disqualify them from receiving the equitable relief they seek.”

“Sanctions are warranted where, as here, a plaintiff (a) with impunity, and without legal justification, misuses our court system to harass, intimidate and publicly malign a former patient and (b) demonstrates a lack of candor to the court, which is reflected in the objectively false statements that are contained in the verified pleading. This Court should protect Ms. Grant and all Peak Wellness’ clients by sending a clear message that such behavior is unacceptable and that Connecticut courts will not allow a doctor to leverage the judicial system to avoid accountability to their patients.”

“Ms. Grant respectfully requests that this Court dismiss and strike the Colker Bill of Discovery, and impose sanctions sufficient to deter Dr. Colker and Peak Wellness from abusing the legal process to harass former patients or avoid his obligations to timely and completely disclose patient records.”

 

[Chris]

 

[Y2Jayne]

Vince was living his dirty kink through Mark Henry and sexual chocolate stuff it seems.

 

[Sabretooth]

Sigh

 

[Comrade Khan]

yeah that's quite the take. not super sad he is gone for the dubs

 

[Chris]

Sounds like he's projecting what it would take for him to speak up onto others

 

[Chairman Jay]

It's funny when a dirty man gets caught, health suddenly* declines* what a load of.

 

[Grimoire Lenin]

I hope Mark enjoys the unemployment line

 

[Butters]

yeah that's quite the take. not super sad he is gone for the dubs

I think they just showed him and his son in the Raw crowd on Monday