I dont get why people constantly talk about 'an upcoming guy who's going to be with WWE for years to come' etc, breaking the streak. how its going to 'put this person over big time' and 'HBK doesn't need to end the streak, he's already way over'.
Ever occured to you, that people like Taker, much like Flair, may get a lot of say in these types of scenarios? You've got the two biggest names in the WWE, two men who can pretty much be named Mr WrestleMania, who've both held the major titles (several times), who have beaten them all, and done it all. You don't think these two guys want to go into this match and want to put a fucker of a shower on, for the fans? Fuck this backstage politics ... fuck putting people over, this is a once of thing - they will want to what they want. Taker, I don't think, is going to want to have someone who HE wants to end the streak, not someone the company wants to put over. I say it will be HBK who ends his streak - because they want to do it - HBK and Taker will want to do it.
Lets think back - everyone said the same thing about Flair retiring. 'It has to put someone over' ... bullshit! It had to come down to who WWE and Flair were both comfortable with ... HBK.
Plus, I'm sure WWE are by now learning that you can't put this kind of shit on someone. Someone, anyone, getting this win will never be set in stone to stay with the company for years and years to come. I think it's too big of a risk to put on some young guns shoulders, like Punk etc. With a HBK or HHH, they know that the 'guy who broke Taker's streak' wasn't someone no one who happened to have a measely WHC title run, and an IC run then left the company a few years later. Would you risk that?