Having just read through the evidence provided by thread starter, I'm still of the opinion that in general TNA's booking is and has been poor for some time now. Wrestling is subjective, therefore different peeps are equally allowed to view things how they see it, I don't personally find the booking to be of a good nature in TNA, but some others do, simple. Why do peeps consistently feel the need to try and prove or disprove something that is at the end of the day subjective. How peeps view booking quality isn't of a quantifiable nature, live and let live, enjoy something for yourself and why give two cents if a possible majority or group don't agree with your view.