Waiting three months to see title matches and championship switches sounds like balls to me.
Think of it in a different way. Instead of having thrown together PPV's every month, most of which don't feel important, you now have time to make each match matter on all four PPV's. As long as TNA doesn't continue to put in so little effort in building up matches, you're going to get so much more for your money than you did before.
Really, three months isn't a long time to wait for a match. Today's fans have been trained to believe that waiting longer than four weeks for anything is too long. In reality, how much excitement can you create for a match when you only have four weeks build?
Dixie has just given up. Can't get those buys, let's get them to order "specials."
I don't see how Dixie gave up. It's been said for years how little she liked having monthly PPV's. If it wasn't for their PPV deal, they probably would have ditched some PPV's long ago. Dixie has finally (Somewhat) gotten her way.
----
I like the idea of ditching PPV's. My only concern is ditching so many at one time. Fans were trained over time to accept more PPV's each year. Look at the WWE. They had four PPV's in 1992. Five PPV's in 1993. Ten PPV's in 1995. And finally 12 in 1996.
On the other hand, the One Night Only PPV's seem to be a lot more iffy. With the shows airing several months after being taped, can TNA really advertise them much? If there's not much storyline involvement in the shows, I don't see the PPV's doing much PPV business. Ironically, I see those One Night Only PPV's creating more interest for old TNA fans, who have long since given up on the company.