Tiger King Mafia Game Thread

[Poyser]

Like he's said himself he thinks his town reads lately suck balls. afaik, he has a poor record reading rugrat as well ( i could be wrong here, memory). So I fail to see the real conviction from him regarding rugrat.

Do you think he had too much conviction? Or too little?

 

[Lethal]

...fair point, you just didn't seem to like Tweet despite the red flags so I thought you had another preferred direction.

If push came to shove, I'd try and get something out of Tweets but I am hesitant as I don't want to appear as though I'm tunneling him, but really, nothing else has piqued my interest.

Look at me being hypocritical with my paper pushing

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Damn guess you didn’t fall into my trap of giving him a generous read with 3 posts to his name

I mean I figured that's what you were doing lol. I stil lthink it's worth asking questions. I also would point to the fact it's you guys making a big thing our of it, not me

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Do you think he had too much conviction? Or too little?

His post read like he had a lot of conviction, and then when I asked if he was serious, he doubled down. He then completely fucked off since I questioned him and voted him.

 

[Poyser]

If push came to shove, I'd try and get something out of Tweets but I am hesitant as I don't want to appear as though I'm tunneling him, but really, nothing else has piqued my interest.

Look at me being hypocritical with my paper pushing

Don’t want to appear to be tunnelling? Why would that matter?

 

[Canadian Dragon]

and the difference, Poyser, is that both Barry and Smark were in thread and active at the time, so asking them both if they have a read on each other seems pretty logical to me, regardless. You asking a read on Odo when he's not really as active or engaged isn't really apples to apples is it?

 

[Lethal]

Don’t want to appear to be tunnelling? Why would that matter?

I want my reads to come from a place of genuine logic with substance and receipts behind them, not just swinging blindly like I always did with poor Skybox. He has an easy out to just say "tunneling" and avoid the discussion. I've been burned before.

 

[Poyser]

His post read like he had a lot of conviction, and then when I asked if he was serious, he doubled down. He then completely fucked off since I questioned him and voted him.

It’s been a while since I played with scum Tweet I think but does he usually start pushing so early? Like I know you’ve said he’s done nothing and idk why he hasn’t shown back

 

[Poyser]

and the difference, Poyser, is that both Barry and Smark were in thread and active at the time, so asking them both if they have a read on each other seems pretty logical to me, regardless. You asking a read on Odo when he's not really as active or engaged isn't really apples to apples is it?

Well no the main difference is I was being facetious to show how stupid it was

 

[Canadian Dragon]

It’s been a while since I played with scum Tweet I think but does he usually start pushing so early? Like I know you’ve said he’s done nothing and idk why he hasn’t shown back

I think his last scum game here was when he was scum with banez and they kept giving me a daykill, if that helps. i think its one of barrys wild west games

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Well no the main difference is I was being facetious to show how stupid it was

I get that, but you only think is stupid because you think I put more value in it then I actually did. Understand what I'm trying to say?

 

[Poyser]

I want my reads to come from a place of genuine logic with substance and receipts behind them, not just swinging blindly like I always did with poor Skybox. He has an easy out to just say "tunneling" and avoid the discussion. I've been burned before.

Doesn’t usually stop you tho?

Am I to take it from you not liking tweet that you do like jeff? Did you make anything of smark’s early play?

 

[Lethal]

I'm just going to go with my instinct here

Vote: Tweetums

Off for my beauty sleep.

 

[Chris]

I get that, but you only think is stupid because you think I put more value in it then I actually did. Understand what I'm trying to say?

So what was the point of doing something that didn't have much value to you? There was the off chance they could have slipped, but if one of them are scum then they're going to be more mindful of what they say about the other since that's not already under a microscope.

 

[Poyser]

I get that, but you only think is stupid because you think I put more value in it then I actually did. Understand what I'm trying to say?

I never accused you of putting value in it lol, that’s a bit of a strawman. In fact my whole point was that I think you kinda knew it was pointless. If you’re not putting value in it (but clearly believe there’s value in the play) then why not keep it in your back pocket until say, half way through day 1, when if one of them was scum they actually would have to force some kind of read on the other. By doing it so early you’ve made it super easy because they don’t have to give an answer