WrestleMania The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar - Discussion Thread

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
29
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
If Taker can take some punishment this match will be great. Obviously Taker's winning, but I'm sure I'll have fun watching it.
 

WarMachine1

Bringing the Internet Pain
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
4,688
Reaction score
412
Points
0
Age
28
Location
Los Angeles, CA
After further review, I know this won't happen, but the only logical finish in my mind for this match (because of the way the feud has been booked) is it to be a no contest. Let these guys beat the shit out of each other for a solid half hour and then they both go for their respective "Death Blows" at the same time and then WAM!!! Both men are suddenly unable to continue the match. They could set that up in two ways. 1. The lights go out and someone attacks both Brock and Taker. 2. They do something similar to what happened to the ring at Royal Rumble 2006. While nobody goes over, this would benefit both men since nobody goes under. Brock couldn't end the streak and Taker couldn't stop Lesnar.
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
After further review, I know this won't happen, but the only logical finish in my mind for this match (because of the way the feud has been booked) is it to be a no contest. Let these guys beat the shit out of each other for a solid half hour and then they both go for their respective "Death Blows" at the same time and then WAM!!! Both men are suddenly unable to continue the match. They could set that up in two ways. 1. The lights go out and someone attacks both Brock and Taker. 2. They do something similar to what happened to the ring at Royal Rumble 2006. While nobody goes over, this would benefit both men since nobody goes under. Brock couldn't end the streak and Taker couldn't stop Lesnar.

Even though I'd prefer a decisive winner here (and as you admit, that's definitely what we're getting), I have to admit that I wouldn't mind this ending happening either. The problem is, from a story point of view, it would almost beg for a rematch to happen the following year. Undertaker felt insecure about the fact that he needed to be helped out after his war with Triple H at Wrestlemania 27 and that's why he wanted another bout with Hunter the following year, and I imagine he would feel a similar way about Lesnar (needing to know he can actually beat him) and would thus challenge him again for WM31.
 

Brad.

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
2,146
Reaction score
502
Points
0
Lesnar really doesn't need to be protected like that. He can lose this match, return in 6 months and look like one of the strongest guys on the roster. I'd consider doing it for Wyatt next year though, eg: Wyatt kicks out of a tombstone, the lights go off, they come back on, and the Family are stood over Taker.
 

Snowman1

Chillin' with the snowmies.
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
33,052
Reaction score
11,726
Points
0
Location
Cuteville
Someone else came up with the idea, but is there any way Brock goes for the Shooting Star Press in this match to avenge the most infamous moment of his career?
 

_GoatFace

Jobber
Joined
Mar 30, 2014
Messages
11
Reaction score
6
Points
0
I really hope they change the match from Regular rules to maybe NO DQ?
 

Troy1

Jobber
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Age
47
Website
twitter.com
Very disappointed WHY and to a Part-timer SMH. How hard is it to keep someone on top.