- Joined
- Mar 7, 2019
- Messages
- 92,043
- Reaction score
- 30,027
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 28
- Location
- Sleepy Eye
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Sports Team
- Favorite Sports Team
- Favorite Sports Team
- Favorite Sports Team
You know this talk about the 14th Amendment really has made me realize just how full of shit Dak is tho.
Roe v. Wade is one thing, but if he's actively advocating for Obergefell v. Hodges to be overturned, he doesn't actually give a shit about the Constitution when that particular decision was heavily entrenched in the 14th Amendment.
And if Obergefell v. Hodges is overturned, the question still stands, is marriage as a whole even a right to citizens? If it is, then Obergefell v. Hodges has to continue to stand. If marriage isn't, then what becomes of Loving vs. Virginia? If marriage isn't a right to the citizenry, then by extension, nobody can be allowed to marry, and thus marriage can't extend to the Equal Protection Clauses.
Racial discrimination is outlawed by the government with the 14th Amendment, so why doesn't that extend to Sexual Orientation and Gender in this case?
The overturning of Obergefell v. Hodges would open up a Pandora's box of disregarding the Constitution's wording entirely. This is why I think Dak is full of shit. He's using the Constitution when it pleases him, and he wants to see the rights of the LGBTQ infringed upon, because he personally hates it according to religion, which should have no standing in what the Federal or State Government decides.
Roe v. Wade is one thing, but if he's actively advocating for Obergefell v. Hodges to be overturned, he doesn't actually give a shit about the Constitution when that particular decision was heavily entrenched in the 14th Amendment.
And if Obergefell v. Hodges is overturned, the question still stands, is marriage as a whole even a right to citizens? If it is, then Obergefell v. Hodges has to continue to stand. If marriage isn't, then what becomes of Loving vs. Virginia? If marriage isn't a right to the citizenry, then by extension, nobody can be allowed to marry, and thus marriage can't extend to the Equal Protection Clauses.
Racial discrimination is outlawed by the government with the 14th Amendment, so why doesn't that extend to Sexual Orientation and Gender in this case?
The overturning of Obergefell v. Hodges would open up a Pandora's box of disregarding the Constitution's wording entirely. This is why I think Dak is full of shit. He's using the Constitution when it pleases him, and he wants to see the rights of the LGBTQ infringed upon, because he personally hates it according to religion, which should have no standing in what the Federal or State Government decides.