The Political Thread

[Hidden Blaze]

I have zero desire to really get into it much, but I’ve seen the Ahmaud case mentioned once or twice on social media in the last last two weeks, but seen something about Kyle Rittenhouse every five minutes.

That being said, I hope they get the book. And I don’t think anyone really disagrees with that sentiment.

Tbh it all comes down to who you follow as well, or friends with or whatever social media it’s on. This isn’t me trying to get into it with you, or bring you into it, so sorry in advance for replying. I’m just wanting to point it out. Because like I said I rarely see anything about either case(nothing all all about Ahmaud to be fair, and Chris said it’s all over his.) because I just don’t follow people who talk about that mess.

 

[Hidden Blaze]

I will say I’m on Facebook more. I’m sure Twitter is more up on it and I probably don’t follow the right people.

before I can reply you even say it lol

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Yeah. Just googled it. Don’t remember ANYTHING about that. But guess maybe it’s because no one from my timeline is defending the people? I don’t know. My one Aunt could. But she’s annoying as fuck so I muted her off my timeline on Facebook.

Without getting into the conspiracy theory too much, part of me thinks Kyle dominated the news cycle since it causes more division as there’s really only only hardcore radicals that are sticking up for Ahmaud’s killers. It was pretty clearly cut and dry on that one.

 

[Chris]

Without getting into the conspiracy theory too much, part of me thinks Kyle dominated the news cycle since it causes more division as there’s really only only hardcore radicals that are sticking up for Ahmaud’s killers. It was pretty clearly cut and dry on that one.

100% agree with this, also why I think some of the more one-sided killings of black folk haven't been as publicized either bc they couldn't paint it as easily for both sides to jump on their bandwagon

 

[Kross Rhodes]

I mostly remember it being very publicized once the video first came out and then I'll agree it's died down once the legal proceedings actually started. Which it felt like happened for the Rittenhouse thing too to me, I didn't actually hear about how that trial was going into like a day before the ruling but apparently I'm in the minority there

Oh for sure, I mean the trial. The original case was everywhere. That was a top story. Just seems the actual trials had two completely kinds of coverage.

For me, anyway.

 

[Hidden Blaze]

Without getting into the conspiracy theory too much, part of me thinks Kyle dominated the news cycle since it causes more division as there’s really only only hardcore radicals that are sticking up for Ahmaud’s killers. It was pretty clearly cut and dry on that one.

It could very well be, and I wouldn’t even argue against it. I’ve made it clear for years, even before “fake news.” Was said how much I hate the media.

 

[Chris]

Oh for sure, I mean the trial. The original case was everywhere. That was a top story. Just seems the actual trials had two completely kinds of coverage. For me, anyway.

This is probably true, my Twitter feed personally hasn't seemed to give a fuck about either trial, didn't even know the Kyle one was going down until it was over lol

 

[Hidden Blaze]

This is probably true, my Twitter feed personally hasn't seemed to give a fuck about either trial, didn't even know the Kyle one was going down until it was over lol

I see you and me both follow all the right people to follow Like legit the only person I saw mention anything at all during the trial was someone on his side, and that was an old family friend on Facebook.

 

[Chris]

I did get a news notification about the closing arguments of the Arbery trial while this convo was ongoing btw....them phones spying on me

 

[Kross Rhodes]

100% agree with this, also why I think some of the more one-sided killings of black folk haven't been as publicized either bc they couldn't paint it as easily for both sides to jump on their bandwagon

And when I say this I mean both sides too. Since the left controls more news channels, they could easily cover them as much too, but it feels like they only cover the ones they know will rile up the right wing.

And vice versa. Fox News and co only cater the stories they can defend from the “left” news etc.

 

[Hidden Blaze]

And when I say this I mean both sides too. Since the left controls more news channels, they could easily cover them as much too, but it feels like they only cover the ones they know will rile up the right wing.

And vice versa. Fox News and co only cater the stories they can defend from the “left” news etc.

Different wings, same shitty ass plane.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

I’ll throw YouTube on there as well. My suggested videos has hundreds of Kyle coverage. No Ahmaud.

I just hope again they get found guilty.

I think it closes soon.

 

[Chris]

And when I say this I mean both sides too. Since the left controls more news channels, they could easily cover them as much too, but it feels like they only cover the ones they know will rile up the right wing. And vice versa. Fox News and co only cater the stories they can defend from the “left” news etc.

Yeah exactly, basically if it's what most people would consider "justified" it gets buried bc the left wouldn't be up in arms, if it's a pretty black and white unjustified killing then it gets buried bc the right can't defend it as well. If it's a layered case with a lot of factors they can latch onto then that gets reported to the moon bc it gets all dem ratings

 

[Chris]

I’ll throw YouTube on there as well. My suggested videos has hundreds of Kyle coverage. No Ahmaud. I just hope again they get found guilty.I think it closes soon.

I purposely avoid all news videos bc I don't want that algorithm to start recommending them nonstop

 

[Hidden Blaze]

My YouTube is wrestling, video games, nascar, football, baseball, different type of list. I do get news stuff but only because for some reason on my YouTube it wants to have a section for news. when I don’t ever watch