noumenon
Guest
Okay, I agree, many wrestlers are remembered for moments and not things, but Taker isn't one of them. He's remember for something, for being undefeated at Mania.
I'm sorry but I don't see Dibiasi and Taker being able to put on an incredible enough match that it will completely overshadow him going whatever-and 0 and Mania. So what then would Taker be remembered for...the guy who won 17 years in a row at Mania and then lost to Ted fucking Dibiasi?
I'm sorry but I don't see Dibiasi and Taker being able to put on an incredible enough match that it will completely overshadow him going whatever-and 0 and Mania. So what then would Taker be remembered for...the guy who won 17 years in a row at Mania and then lost to Ted fucking Dibiasi?