Sting vs Undertaker next year - yes or no?

[MarcMadison]

Yeah, I don't think I'm expecting a spectacle per say but rather being able to tell a really good story with two very mobile guys which sadly isnt the case for Taker. Sting/Taker wasn't awful vut certainly could have done with all the extra curricular stuff with the run-ins.

 

[Fuji Vice]

Tbh if they run Sting/Taker it's going to be about the spectacle and that's perfectly fine. Hell, the most important 'Mania match of all time was between two less than mobile guys and focused almost solely on the spectacle. That one turned out pretty well, so would this.

That being said, I'd still rather see Cena/Taker.

 

[Sabretooth]

Tbh if they run Sting/Taker it's going to be about the spectacle and that's perfectly fine. Hell, the most important 'Mania match of all time was between two less than mobile guys and focused almost solely on the spectacle. That one turned out pretty well, so would this.

That being said, I'd still rather see Cena/Taker.

Do you mean Hogan/Andre?

 

[Fuji Vice]

Do you mean Hogan/Andre?

No, Hogan/Bundy.












































































































































Of course I meant Hogan/Andre. :

 

[Sabretooth]

No, Hogan/Bundy.












































































































































Of course I meant Hogan/Andre. :

Hogan moved fine in 87

 

[Fuji Vice]

Hogan moved fine in 87

Sure, but was he flying all over the ring or bumping like 'Taker was in his Michaels matches? Nope.