Just like how it's up to the courts to try them kids in Ohio as an adult, in GA there is determining factors.
The fact that the jury had found that two aggravating factors applied to Coker's crime – his prior convictions and the fact that the rape was committed during the course of a robbery – did not change the Court's conclusion
This would normally have got him executed because they are the aggravating factors needed to impose capital punishment. But when the Supreme Court stepped it, all it did was stop his execution. He still got the capital punishment because he still serving life sentences in Prison. So either way he still got it. That's how
IE: The Supreme Court ruled that he couldn't be killed is the only reason he didn't get it. But he should have got it because he did COMMIT the crime as an escaped convict and during a Robbery. Hence the multiple life sentences. So however you look at it, he got capital punishment my son because he is serving a life sentence. So, you're wrong because the argument was about it being a capital offense which it was, he just didn't get executed like he normally would have. And that still is the courts decision if they should or not. (Coker that is)