I don't know why either side is making this comparison. Situation isn't even remotely the same.
People thought Sasha should keep the title: she lost
People thought Miz should keep the title: he lost
I don't know why either side is making this comparison. Situation isn't even remotely the same.
If Sasha simply losing was the reason you were upset, you're as big of a mark as they said you were.People thought Sasha should keep the title: she lost
People thought Miz should keep the title: he lost
WWE may have realized Miz is ready for bigger angles. I'm going to wait to see what WWE does with him.Just watched Smackdown for the first time in a long while. Got to say I was very impressed with the whole show, the AJ/Cena contract signing was great and I really like the look of Baron Corbin. I've always preferred Ziggler as a heel so him potentially turning heel would be great for his character.
However, I may be a little bit bias here due to how much I like the Miz but does anybody else think it's the wrong decision to take the title from him? From what I've read, the general consensus seemed to be that Miz made the IC Title feel actually important and it was treated as more than just a prop. It seems strange that WWE have finally got somebody to make the IC Title look important and then just stopped that.
If Sasha simply losing was the reason you were upset, you're as big of a mark as they said you were.
Sasha Banks lost twice to Bayley in NXT and not only was I proud of those matches, I believed in that division.
Still waiting for someone of off-himself.
You know at least your words would hold merit...
i wouldn't know cause I'd be dead
You don't understand bein' a man of your word then. You'd probably weasel out of a simple sig bet.