Rumored Top 3 WM Matches

[Chris Michaels]

I hope a stipulation comes about for John Cena vs. The Rock, like, last man standing, or I quit

 

[Sabretooth]

or Nash vs Kane!

Nash vs big show. Kane vs mark Henry vs (and maybe Daniel Bryan)

 

[Chris Michaels]

or HHH vs. Kane, and Nash vs. Taker?!?! lol who knows!!!

 

[Sabretooth]

I hope a stipulation comes about for John Cena vs. The Rock, like, last man standing, or I quit

NO NO NO : a match of this caliber needs no stip. Just a good clean wrestling match between two of the best

 

[Fuji Vice]

Yes, I agree. Besides, stipulation matches distract from the match itself. Cena/Punk is a lot of people's MOTY, and it didn't have any stips attached. If it had been LMS, I doubt people would have looked at it as fondly.

 

[Smart Marx]

Sometimes a stip can give a match more excitement but most of the time they don't need 'em. Especially if it's a first encounter.

HHH/UT should get a stip though. Three standard matches at 'Mania wears a little thin.

I'd prefer we didn't get that match at all though. But I'm sure you all know my feelings about Undertaker's WrestleMania matches by now... :

Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk

 

[Sabretooth]

I'm really stoked for undertaker and triple h III. Taker facing a veteran makes the match feel more special. Not only do I think that guys like wade barrett and sheamus not have the caliber to face taker but there's no point in having a young guy challenging the streak only to get buried

 

[Sabretooth]

What do you have against triple h vs the undertaker #HEEL

 

[Smart Marx]

Just that match? I've seen it twice already.

Undertaker and WrestleMania in general? Check the unpopular opinions thread.

I'm really stoked for undertaker and triple h III. Taker facing a veteran makes the match feel more special. Not only do I think that guys like wade barrett and sheamus not have the caliber to face taker but there's no point in having a young guy challenging the streak only to get buried

I agree. There's no point in a young guy getting buried by Undertaker.


Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk

 

[Postman Dave]

What I'm hoping for as a card based on these 3 matches leading:

Rock/Cena
HHH/Undertaker
Punk/Jericho

Henry/Orton/Bryan
Miz/Foley
Kane/Sheamus

well, that's all I've got at the moment but I reckon that's not too bad.

 

[Cyrus Riddle]

Not a bad card at all...I would really prefer that they include MITB at 'Mania, thus doing away with the gimmick PPV of it. The fact that you could only see one MITB match a year, and it was at Wrestlemania, made it special.

 

[Sabretooth]

Daniel Bryan would have never gotten his opportunity if it weren't for the money bank pay per view

 

[Cyrus Riddle]

True, but you could also argue that had he been given the opportunity to win MITB at WM as opposed to the PPV in July, he might look like a stronger competitor than he does currently. It's all about value, having two guys with a briefcase isn't nearly as effective as having one guy with a briefcase.

 

[Sabretooth]

Yeah but if he won it at wrestlemania then he couldn't cash in at wrestlemania unless he cashed in the same night or waited a year.

 

[Cyrus Riddle]

True, but if given a year to build, you can't go wrong with the right pacing. In a year's time, you can make Daniel Bryan just as appealing as CM Punk, establish him as a threat, and have fans want to pay to see him at 'Mania wreslting for one of the belts.