The thing is when Sting was at his hottest he was the distant second to Goldberg.
Totally disagree.
Sting vs nWo was the hottest thing in wrestling for most of '97, if it wasn't for the screwjob it would of been the story of the year.
The thing is when Sting was at his hottest he was the distant second to Goldberg.
Sting made to be major foe to Hogan and what happens after 97? Oh yes, thats right. WWF domination.
And if he was really the icon and supposed draw, TNA would've generated decent ratings.
Shit argument, that company is dead out anyway, look at all the proven draws that have gone there and failed to get interest. Hogan, Hardy, Angle etc have all failed to make a dent in the ratings. Its because TNA is a shit wrestling promotion with no upside, not because these guys arent stars.
Also, pinning the turn in the Monday Night Wars on Sting is ridiculous and laughable, could easily make the same argument for Bret Hart being a company killer too.
Argument isn't shit because WCW folded, Icon status is from proving yourself as a solid draw, which he didn't.
Laughable how? Him beating Hogan for the title was supposed to be the biggest thing evar for WCW. Seeing how fans lost interest after WCW dumbfuckery after dumbfuckery in regards to Stings storyline. It's a valid point imo.
Not to duck the issue, but do you consider Bret Hart an icon?
I realise you have Canada listed as yr location so this might be as pointless as asking you if the sky is blue, but he's a guy who was one of the main guys in both companies while they were on their deathbed, yet his contribution to wrestling is immessurable.
It's a semantics argument really, whether we call him an icon or legend doesnt matter. The real point is Road Warrior Animal of all people isn't the guy to decide. When did he ever draw as a singles wrestler.