Reigns still draws more than Punk

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Roadster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
44,470
Reaction score
4,214
Points
118
Favorite Wrestler
uUsHwHt
Favorite Wrestler
CVWSrPC
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
L1l4tIp
It's really bizarre to me that SmackDown being marginally ahead of AEW's shows is some big hurrah victory. CM Punk alone won't draw 5m people. The fact is that they're doing numbers unseen for a promotion outside of WWE for the last 20 years, and that's a reason to be optimistic and assess them as drawing well, and competing. WWE will draw more people on name value and availability, alone. If SmackDown is cracking 1.5m and AEW is cracking 1.4m, it's a massive victory for AEW and a massive loss for SmackDown. That's how expectations work. Unless we're to assume the company with the most recognizable names in wrestling barely edging a company that's 2 years old is somehow a big win.
 

InsaneAlphaBeta

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2017
Messages
4,053
Reaction score
988
Points
113
Age
29
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho2
Ya know I think Roman Reigns does move the needle more then punk, just look at the movement on this graph.
Capture+_2021-08-27-15-37-13.png
 

Jacob Fox

Quiet You
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
59,061
Reaction score
12,438
Points
118
Both times Punk showed up on AEW, he drew the same rating they were getting before he debuted. He couldn't even get AEW to beat the worst Raw rating. Blood and Guts got a 1.09 million and a CM Punk episode of dynamite got a 1.17 million.Reigns draws 2 million weekly. Do you think with Bryan they will get to 1.4 million like before?

No, actually they did better with Punk. This week's Dynamite was up 20.2 percent from Dynamite last week. That is an amazing figure.

Furthermore, Dynamite was up 37% in the 18-49 demo, which is the most important audience.

This is extremely significant and Roman Reigns has NEVER appeared on a show that got a boost like that from the previous week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mustafar Reginald

Jacob Fox

Quiet You
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
59,061
Reaction score
12,438
Points
118
I think being able to sell out a stadium on just a rumor alone speaks volumes. I don’t pay attention to ratings, I just enjoy what I enjoy, but, we can’t ignore the fact Punk alone got the place sold out on “maybe he will be there, maybe he won’t”.

WWE has never sold out the United Center. Not one single time. AEW did in within minutes. So I agree with you about that.

I was at Summerslam 94 and there were missing seats. I was at both Wrestlemania 13 and Wrestlemania 22 at the Allstate Arena. Again, empty seats especially 33.

Jim Ross seemed to made a crack about WWE when he said that he hadn't been in the United Center since 1994. Because WWE knew they couldn't sell it out with a Chicago crowd, they never went back.
 

Jacob Fox

Quiet You
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
59,061
Reaction score
12,438
Points
118
Both times he showed up on AEW, CM Punk drew the same rating they were getting before he debuted. He couldn't even get AEW to beat the worst Raw rating. Blood and Guts got a 1.09 million and a CM Punk episode of dynamite got a 1.17 million Even the first episode of AEW has that same rating.Reigns draws 2 million weekly.

The first episode of Dynamite was two years ago. You cannot compare a two year old rating and say that Punk didn't draw because of that. The fact is that, as I put in an earlier post, Punk's appearances drew bigger ratings than before he debuted. You have to compare it to last week's rating, not a rating two years ago.

It doesn't matter if Dynamite can't beat Raw yet. They are still a new company. But they have grown faster than any company in wrestling history. The ratings they have gotten have been fantastic and WWE should be worried.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mustafar Reginald

Marty McFourth

Trying to figure out this life thing, what about you
Joined
Feb 9, 2020
Messages
78,714
Reaction score
57,015
Points
128
Age
28
Location
England
I think being able to sell out a stadium on just a rumor alone speaks volumes. I don’t pay attention to ratings, I just enjoy what I enjoy, but, we can’t ignore the fact Punk alone got the place sold out on “maybe he will be there, maybe he won’t”.
It literally sold out in minutes on a rumour. That is just insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mustafar Reginald

InsaneAlphaBeta

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2017
Messages
4,053
Reaction score
988
Points
113
Age
29
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
undertaker
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho2
The first episode of Dynamite was two years ago. You cannot compare a two year old rating and say that Punk didn't draw because of that. The fact is that, as I put in an earlier post, Punk's appearances drew bigger ratings than before he debuted. You have to compare it to last week's rating, not a rating two years ago.

It doesn't matter if Dynamite can't beat Raw yet. They are still a new company. But they have grown faster than any company in wrestling history. The ratings they have gotten have been fantastic and WWE should be worried.
Espacially when you look at the downward trajectory of WWEs ratings and interested (as demonstraighted in that graph above) Meanwhile we dont even have Daniel Bryan yet, or Adam Cole, or Bray Wyatt. And if AEW does get all 3 of them to go along with Cm Punk, it will be huge for them in the long term.

And the long term growth of the company is far more important then short term growth, even if Punk being there doesnt keep the ratings this high for long, he still presents long term value for the company as a whole, same with all those other names. They all are long term investments.

Meanwhile WWE is killing their own company, granted they have so much money they will be here for many years to come even if their ratings fall off a cliff, but still they are in trouble if they dont have the foresight to see where things are headed if they stay on this path.