SummerSlam Rate SummerSlam 2015

[Jacob Fox]

And I'm still not a fan of that explanation. I guess it's just not my cup of tea. I would've preferred a DQ ending.

I'm not saying I'm a fan of it either. In fact, I think it's an incredibly stupid explanation. But, like Undertaker cheating to beat Lesnar, I don't have to like it to assume that's what they are going to do.

Take Flair for instance. Well he actually counts his world title reigns at 21. But I guarantee you, he doesn't care if Cena ties the 16 world titles. You'll never meet a bigger Flair mark than me and I don't care either. If I had to guess, Cena is probably the guy Flair wants to do it. But Stewart made it clear that he did.

So yeah, it's a stupid story and a stupid explanation for why Stewart did it. But being a stupid explanation might make it more likely to be the one WWE is going with.

 

[Prince Bálor]

I'm not saying I'm a fan of it either. In fact, I think it's an incredibly stupid explanation. But, like Undertaker cheating to beat Lesnar, I don't have to like it to assume that's what they are going to do.

Take Flair for instance. Well he actually counts his world title reigns at 21. But I guarantee you, he doesn't care if Cena ties the 16 world titles. You'll never meet a bigger Flair mark than me and I don't care either. If I had to guess, Cena is probably the guy Flair wants to do it. But Stewart made it clear that he did.

So yeah, it's a stupid story and a stupid explanation for why Stewart did it. But being a stupid explanation might make it more likely to be the one WWE is going with.

Oh, got ya now.

It's probably what they'll be going with. Oh, well.

 

[The GOAT]

- Undertaker vs Lesnar was surprisingly good and pretty enjoyable. ***½
While I love Brock and I'm not really a fan of Taker's, I wasn't mad at the ending.
This match ended in the only way it could've, in order to tell the story they're trying to tell.
Taker losing kills him completely and beyond repair, and Taker going over clean kills Lesnar's momentum.
It had to end with shenanigans.

Nonsense. We're talking about twenty-five years of Undertaker establishing himself as a legend, another loss to the most intimidating threat in WWE history isn't gonna change or unravel any of that.

The entire world witnessed him tapping out anyway. His victory over Lesnar was every bit as tainted as Rollins' victory over Cena was. Maybe even more so.

 

[Prince Bálor]

Nonsense. We're talking about twenty-five years of Undertaker establishing himself as a legend, another loss to the most intimidating threat in WWE history isn't gonna change or unravel any of that.

The entire world witnessed him tapping out anyway. His victory over Lesnar was every bit as tainted as Rollins' victory over Cena was. Maybe even more so.

Taker just scored his first victory over Lesnar and the way they did it, it doesn't hurt Lesnar.
Taker coming back for revenge and still coming up short would've been nonsensical.

I would've been cool with Lesnar winning, but as I've said before, Taker coming back for revenge and finally pulling a victory over Lesnar makes sense to me.

Lesnar is still THE BEAST, and the way things are going, Lesnar will most likely become the only man to ever defeat Taker twice at WrestleMania.

 

[Jacob Fox]

Oh, got ya now.

It's probably what they'll be going with. Oh, well.

I'm on a roll with this predicting thing.

 

[The GOAT]

Taker just scored his first victory over Lesnar and the way they did it, it doesn't hurt Lesnar.
Taker coming back for revenge and still coming up short would've been nonsensical.

I would've been cool with Lesnar winning, but as I've said before, Taker coming back for revenge and finally pulling a victory over Lesnar makes sense to me.

Lesnar is still THE BEAST, and the way things are going, Lesnar will most likely become the only man to ever defeat Taker twice at WrestleMania.

I didn't say it hurt Lesnar, I said Undertaker losing wouldn't have hurt him. And we all saw that he should have lost anyway, so his win isn't really much to brag about.