Rate Smackdown 9/11/2018

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Rate Smackdown

  • 0/10

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1/10

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2/10

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3/10

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4/10

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • 5/10

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • 6/10

    Votes: 2 50.0%
  • 7/10

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 8/10

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 9/10

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 10/10

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4

Jacob Fox

Quiet You
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
62,023
Reaction score
13,804
Points
118
Because that worked so well with AJ/Nakamura.

So it is true in one case ergo it is true in every case? That's a silly way of thinking. In fact, I remember when Ben Affleck was cast as Batman and plenty of people said that those opposed to the casting forget that no one wanted Heath Ledger to play the Joker but he ended up being perfect in the role. So they assumed that automatically applied to Ben Affleck simply because the situation was similar. That was silly thinking. Whether something works or doesn't work in one situation, doesn't guarantee it will do the same in similar situations.

Even in their NJPW match, I don't feel that AJ and Nakamura have chemistry. Joe and AJ have a long history and chemistry.

You can't determine how something is going to work between two people simply because it didn't work with others.