- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
- Messages
- 31,583
- Reaction score
- 5,877
- Points
- 28
- Age
- 30
- Location
- The United States of Ambrose
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
It could be like he's apart of the RAW brand, even though he'd still only show up for WM season. Just trying to make excuses for Shane winning, and WWE still doing Cena vs. Taker next year. I agree though, they've had weeks to flesh it out but it still makes little sense.As far as I know Shane gets control of Raw only so I don't think so. Vince would still run the company but Shane would get Raw (no idea why Vince wouldn't just fire Shane from that position as he'd still run the company though) Seriously am I being an idiot or does this story make 0 sense?
But I do remember Vince saying that if Shane controls RAW he pretty much owns the company. Still doesn't make too much sense backstage wise.