Production Costs for WWE Studio Projects Revealed

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Troy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
23,057
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Streets Ahead
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
pwinsider said:
Last week, WWE listed the production costs for recent WWE Studio projects:

* No One Lives – $2,200,000
* The Marine 3 – $1,400,000
* 12 Rounds: Reloaded – $1,300,000

May not be interesting to some but I think it is interesting to see how the direction of WWE Studio has changed. They have switched from $15 million budgets when they were aiming for wide release in theatres to much smaller budgets for their direct to DVD movies. This doesn't take into account marketing cost but they would save a lot on that as they have the ability to plug it like crazy during their shows each week.

They have pulled in decent sales so far as well, The Marine 3 has pulled in over $2.5 million in DVD sales and over a million in Blu Ray sales. Must better strategy that won't be such a drain for the company and may actually make them some money.
 

Keith

WCW Halloween Phantom
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,933
Reaction score
3,294
Points
113
It was the only way to go if they were going to insist on keeping the movie studio as the movies were costing too much and very few of the wrestlers looked like they could be break out movie stars.
 

Troy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
23,057
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Streets Ahead
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
It is better that they are now using WWE stars in supporting roles in the feature films that they co-produce. Nothing wrong with a wrestler headlining a straight to DVD release but for those theatrical releases they don't have enough star power, or ability, to carry those roles.

Has anyone here seen No One Lives? I have said for quite some time that WWE should produce more horror films after the big success of See No Evil.
 

Chris

Dreams are Endless
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
383,775
Reaction score
155,570
Points
128
Age
28
Location
Texas
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Wrestler
OEndG4L
Favorite Wrestler
ArsUxsj
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Wrestler
BryanDanielson1
Favorite Sports Team
sfa
Favorite Sports Team
dallascowboys
Favorite Sports Team
sanantoniospurs
Favorite Sports Team
texasrangers
They found a way to make a profit, definitely a better strategy than before.
 

Deezy

DZ PZ
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
139,458
Reaction score
39,394
Points
118
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
brethart2
Favorite Wrestler
newjack
Favorite Wrestler
ddp
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Favorite Wrestler
wolfpac
Straight to DVD is a pretty lucrative market when you find your footing in certain demographics. People like Jason Statham, Michal Jai White, Jean Claude Van Damme and hell even Steve Austin make a pretty good living off straight to DVDs. Good strategy, but I'm interested in how much the cartoons are going to cost them tbh.
 

PHX

Legacy Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
23,705
Reaction score
402
Points
83
Age
36
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk2
Favorite Wrestler
adamcole2
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles2
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
dx
Favorite Wrestler
samoajoe
Favorite Sports Team
n1QhWSb
Favorite Sports Team
osX2DVG
Really had no choice but to start being realistic about themselves in the movie business. Made no sense to spend a shit load of money and not get any profit off of it. Not like it showed in a good way how much they were spending before.
 

Troy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
23,057
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Streets Ahead
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Straight to DVD is a pretty lucrative market when you find your footing in certain demographics. People like Jason Statham, Michal Jai White, Jean Claude Van Damme and hell even Steve Austin make a pretty good living off straight to DVDs. Good strategy, but I'm interested in how much the cartoons are going to cost them tbh.

Steven Seagal would be another to add to that list. With the cartoons they are co-producing them with Warner Bros and Hanna-Barbera plus animation is so much cheaper since you pay the actors so much less so they wont have to spend as much. Also depends on if they are going straight to DVD with the Scooby Doo and Flinstones movies or if they are aiming for a theatrical release.
 

Keith

WCW Halloween Phantom
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,933
Reaction score
3,294
Points
113
It is better that they are now using WWE stars in supporting roles in the feature films that they co-produce. Nothing wrong with a wrestler headlining a straight to DVD release but for those theatrical releases they don't have enough star power, or ability, to carry those roles.

Has anyone here seen No One Lives? I have said for quite some time that WWE should produce more horror films after the big success of See No Evil.

More horror movies would make sense as that is a genre which fits quite nicely into the straight to DVD market, also a lot of the best horrors are low budget anyway.
 

Troy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
23,057
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Streets Ahead
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
More horror movies would make sense as that is a genre which fits quite nicely into the straight to DVD market, also a lot of the best horrors are low budget anyway.

It makes so much sense and that is why it is odd WWE have waited so long to make another horror film. Plus with the characters that they have in wrestling there are a few that would translate quite well into a horror film, just like Kane did.
 

Deezy

DZ PZ
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
139,458
Reaction score
39,394
Points
118
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
brethart2
Favorite Wrestler
newjack
Favorite Wrestler
ddp
Favorite Wrestler
therock
Favorite Wrestler
nwo
Favorite Wrestler
wolfpac
WWE will co-produce an Ayn Rand biographic film written by Kane.

edit: Well as soon as I made my headscratcher of a joke, I find out WWE and Lionsgate are going to make the sequel to See No Evil.

Maybe this time Vince's pitch of Goodnights 3 foot dick gets the greenligh.t
 
Last edited:

John McHenry

John McHenry
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
21,190
Reaction score
2,535
Points
113
Location
Ohio
Favorite Wrestler
dolphziggler2
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
brianpillman
Favorite Wrestler
shaneomac
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold2
The worst of their films costs the most 8D
 

Dale

Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
33,168
Reaction score
22,247
Points
118
Location
England
Favorite Wrestler
ui9LmS7
Favorite Wrestler
Y06mUrE
Favorite Wrestler
EtPxwR9
Favorite Wrestler
eAVr0ua
Favorite Wrestler
GDgC9g9
Favorite Wrestler
zPa7dqi
dfgdfgdfgdf