- Joined
- May 22, 2011
- Messages
- 81,971
- Reaction score
- 37,899
- Points
- 138
- Age
- 48
- Location
- Wherever Your Mom Is
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
A reporter asked Paul Levesque about Drew Gulak's status.
Fightful had reported that Drew Gulak was released.
Paul Levesque stated that was not true. His contract expired and it was not renewed by them
A question came in about Gulak's "release" after the report by Fightful. Triple H told the reporter to cite a reputable source in the future and said Gulak was not released, but his contract was never renewed.
Same difference but fair enough
I thought that with the new us federal rules technically those 90 days aren't legally enforceable anyways (still think ppl will b happy to take free money to stay home ).Well now Gulak can just show up anywhere this week, that’s really the only difference
I’m not sure how it applies to wrestling yet. Will have to see someone show up right away somewhere before we truly know I guessI thought that with the new us federal rules technically those 90 days aren't legally enforceable anyways (still think ppl will b happy to take free money to stay home ).
That being said, will be interesting because we know Dragon loves the guy
It for sure applies the executives at least. Like that bullshit Renee had to do (year + can't work) would be illegal.I’m not sure how it applies to wrestling yet. Will have to see someone show up right away somewhere before we truly know I guess
They’re not enforceable, but a lot of talents can still technically take it if they want to get paid for 90 days.I thought that with the new us federal rules technically those 90 days aren't legally enforceable anyways (still think ppl will b happy to take free money to stay home ).
That being said, will be interesting because we know Dragon loves the guy
Yes, and no. Once they get their notice of release, they are released but they do get paid for those 90 days.I'm pretty sure WWE's 90 day no compete is totally misinterpreted anyway. People seem to think the talent actually get released and then they can't sign anywhere else for that period of time whereas as far as I know, it's more of a 'btw in 90 days we're gonna be releasing you from your contract.' I forget who it is but I believe they tried using someone before who they "released" and they turned it down for obvious reasons.
See I don’t know about that, because a lot of times it’s more so you can’t work tv for those 90 days. Unless they are just like we’re cutting you, so go ahead and take non tv bookings if you want to. Because back when Bryan got released for the tie thing, he worked a indie show around my area, but it never could be put on the dvd or on tv because of the 90 daysI'm pretty sure WWE's 90 day no compete is totally misinterpreted anyway. People seem to think the talent actually get released and then they can't sign anywhere else for that period of time whereas as far as I know, it's more of a 'btw in 90 days we're gonna be releasing you from your contract.' I forget who it is but I believe they tried using someone before who they "released" and they turned it down for obvious reasons.
Yeah, I’m like almost entirely positive it’s the way that you’re describing and are often depends on the language of the npncompete as sometimes they can even appear on television but they just can’t wrestle. That happened with Ric Flair even back in the 90s he was allowed to appear on TV in talk show segments but for some reason he couldn’t wrestle.See I don’t know about that, because a lot of times it’s more so you can’t work tv for those 90 days. Unless they are just like we’re cutting you, so go ahead and take non tv bookings if you want to. Because back when Bryan got released for the tie thing, he worked a indie show around my area, but it never could be put on the dvd or on tv because of the 90 days