No More Happy Endings - Once Upon a Time Mafia Game Thread

[Tommy Bedlam]

Doing a bit of catching up.

If it were such an obvious thing to ask, why did no one else do it already?

I don't like this response at all.

I was kind of out of it doing IRL things at the time Juice's detective post happened, that was the take-home from a readback

This seems like a much more viable reason as to why you waited to ask the question. I'm not sure why you chose to lead with the first response before swtiching to this.

 

[Comrade Khan]

And what did you think? Why are you asking others instead of giving your opinion?

I would actually also like Sky to answer this

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

Okay, fair enough.

Any reads though? It’s been very much the same few people for most of the day so far so it’d be good for those that are here to give us some things to work with?

Ehh not really so far think I'm ok with most the post so far nothing really stood out yet

 

[Baldrick]

Evening

 

[Kim Jong Umb]

Evening

Missed you Boo

 

[Leon TrotSky]

I’m interested to explore this a bit more. I saw you said that it was the lack of favouring one option over the others that prompted you to read it as Juice sitting on the fence.

My view of it was that Juice was actually giving us a lot to talk through and had the discussion veered onto discussing the options we could have gotten some decent stuff out of it.

Is there no credit from you for actually producing the options and extra discussion points, even though Juice didn’t elaborate or rank them in order of probability?

Let's answer that by looking through the 3 options:

1. Mafia is prolonging the dumb Lethal/Jeff argument in order to harm town - subtle bit of shade on everyone involved in the argument, implying that one or more of Lethal/Jeff/myself is scum so town will vote among us and probably hit at least 2/3 town.
2. Lethal is trying to get voted up - we don't benefit from Jester spec at this early stage, it's just a distraction.
3. This is all just town/town D1 fodder - obvious ass coverage "there could be, or there could not be", trying to seem noncommittal for later.

All 3 options, though discussion points they may be, are inherently non-productive (and serve to further scum's cause in the first two cases), and not distinguishing between them is somehow worse than committing to one of them. That's the full explanation

 

[Leon TrotSky]

And what did you think? Why are you asking others instead of giving your opinion?

Because others are better readers than me. I've been doing this for six years plus and we've established this.

 

[Leon TrotSky]

Doing a bit of catching up.

I don't like this response at all.


This seems like a much more viable reason as to why you waited to ask the question. I'm not sure why you chose to lead with the first response before swtiching to this.

I don't see how the two of them are incompatible responses.

 

[Tommy Bedlam]

Let's answer that by looking through the 3 options:

1. Mafia is prolonging the dumb Lethal/Jeff argument in order to harm town - subtle bit of shade on everyone involved in the argument, implying that one or more of Lethal/Jeff/myself is scum so town will vote among us and probably hit at least 2/3 town.
2. Lethal is trying to get voted up - we don't benefit from Jester spec at this early stage, it's just a distraction.
3. This is all just town/town D1 fodder - obvious ass coverage "there could be, or there could not be", trying to seem noncommittal for later.

All 3 options, though discussion points they may be, are inherently non-productive (and serve to further scum's cause in the first two cases), and not distinguishing between them is somehow worse than committing to one of them. That's the full explanation

And in direct contrast to my last post, I really like this post. I don't necessarily agree with all of it, but that's some sound reasoning. Seems like the most engaged that Sky has been up to this point.

 

[Mandalorian]

Let's answer that by looking through the 3 options:

1. Mafia is prolonging the dumb Lethal/Jeff argument in order to harm town - subtle bit of shade on everyone involved in the argument, implying that one or more of Lethal/Jeff/myself is scum so town will vote among us and probably hit at least 2/3 town.
2. Lethal is trying to get voted up - we don't benefit from Jester spec at this early stage, it's just a distraction.
3. This is all just town/town D1 fodder - obvious ass coverage "there could be, or there could not be", trying to seem noncommittal for later.

All 3 options, though discussion points they may be, are inherently non-productive (and serve to further scum's cause in the first two cases), and not distinguishing between them is somehow worse than committing to one of them. That's the full explanation

This is the kind of response I was hoping for.

So putting pieces together, were Juice mafia, that would nudge Lethal and Jeff towards your town leans?

 

[Comrade Khan]

I don't see how the two of them are incompatible responses.

from my pov it's the timing thing too but you saying it was when you were doing a readback is a fairly plausible and believable defense.

 

[Comrade Khan]

And in direct contrast to my last post, I really like this post. I don't necessarily agree with all of it, but that's some sound reasoning. Seems like the most engaged that Sky has been up to this point.

where does that leave you regarding her alignment? what about the people currently pushing her?

 

[B01]

I have no idea what is going on. I feel like I'm watching cricket.

Sent from my 5062Z using Tapatalk

 

[Baldrick]

I have no idea what is going on. I feel like I'm watching cricket.

Sent from my 5062Z using Tapatalk

So you like to play and miss?

 

[Grimoire Lenin]

I'm pretty comfortable with Sky at the moment, I'd say

The third theory is probably the most plausible so the question is who would be perpetuating the other two the most, right?