- Joined
- Aug 21, 2019
- Messages
- 7,012
- Reaction score
- 4,080
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 32
Idc that Gambit tries to hide behind a read that he thinks (or pretends to think) that Jeff made, what it boils down to is he read Haza town for 2-3 posts at best, that from my perspective don't even slightly warrant a town read. The argument that he hasn't played in a while doesn't apply cause he admitted he's not reading Haza based on meta, but on the merit of those few posts. He gave reasons for why he made that read but I don't currently buy em.
This is bad.
Scrutinizing a page 1 vote while saying that it is justified yet voting rugrat because its not a serious attempt at scumhunting...on page 1
vote skybox
You've played 10/15 games this year why you lying
The post just didn't make any sense. Are you voting him for the hell of it because you think he is fake scumhunting, the latter doesn't make any sense but like you used it as a reason
Chris doesn't need to be wagoned d1 people just need to stop misclearing him and then forgetting about him by d5
You were reading into rugrats vote on chris why can't I read into your vote on rugrat?
So it was actually about 5 game related posts that help with the current game and as I said before I've made reads off less and been correct. The aggressive tone early on when he could get away with fluffing (which he was doing as well in between these just to add further credence to the "2-3 posts at best" being wrong.) It is a town lean on day 1 and 5 posts if more than enough to go on. Plus his posts since are correct