Sky's stance was that she was not prepared to lynch Juice, and seemingly even scummy play on Juice's part wouldn't have shaken that stance. At that point in time, Juice had not made any of the questionable posts that she has since made, and thus, there was no reason for Juice to be suggested as a target.
My point of those posts was to evidence that Juice could actually be taking advantage of Sky if that was Sky's position. Which is what I even said in the thread when Juice suggested that I was saying that Sky was trying to pocket her, when I was actually suggesting it could be the opposite. Neither Juice or Sky responded to that.
I read this post like 3 times and have 0 clue what point this guy is trying to make
Nah just get me out. I’m fed up with this. This is exactly what happened in the last game and I’m not prepared to waste any more of my time beating the same drum over and over again.
Apparently being cautious and wanting to think and talk things through is a bad thing here. Sorry I don’t throw a vote down first and think later and I’m more interested in trying to discuss hypotheticals when we have no actual tangible information to go off because it is day fucking one.
Don’t quote my posts or tag me.
Weak. Funnily enough, this is probably the towniest thing I've seen from him, but I'm not going to read into a very emotional response all that much without knowing the person in question
Now, considering what I've already picked up on, I find the following chain of posts pretty interesting and all too coincidental:
What are our actual realistic vote options at this point? Man, Wang, Jango, OMB? Probably more realistically Man and Wang?
Am I the only one who susses out Sky and the lack of logic in some of her arguments/defense? I also don't really understand what half of Jango's posts even mean, is that normal?
Need to do a deeper dive on Man's posts.
Can you actually list your reasoning for voting Man?
Official Vote: OMB
Now I'm sure you'll really think I'm scum. My reasoning for voting you? I don't like the fact that you're listing people as scummy and not actually basing it on anything that's been posted in the thread.
The Man back and forth I also read and don't quite understand what scum vibes you're getting. He explained himself to you in a response and you sort of just ignored that.
I wouldn't even call what you're doing tunnel vision but more so just twisting your own narrative to make certain people look scummy. AND THAT, my dear Sky, is not town behavior.
It's not really a one vs the other to me at this point. I don't have enough to get an actual read on Man, and OMB flipping scum wouldn't clear him by any means.
If Man flips scum, I would definitely back off OMB for a bit though.
Man flipping town would make OMB look really bad for sure, but we already know he's going off essentially nothing for his scum reads to begin with.
OMB flipping town would probably make me look worse than Man at this point. I think Man is sussing OMB for the same reasons I am, and it's the fact that he's calling us scum without any actual basis. See when I called Sky out for being defensive, it was in response to my posts where I actually was giving reasons and asking questions. OMB isn't asking questions and his entire scum read list was all just shit about us as players and nothing about the game. I don't think he even read any of our game posts when he made it.
Ok yes, but you listed four names you thought were scum and only one of those had ANY actual reasoning. If you worded it more as "these are some people to be wary of based on past game experiences" then sure.
But you have to actually connect that to posts from THIS game for it to work.
Man has way more posts than you and I, and I went through them and a lot of them are actually asking questions and making reads. Can you quote which post you saw as fluff and why it concerns you?
And also in his last post, you said he didn't come off as a townie, what specifically in that post gave you that read (other than disagreeing with you)?
Genuinely, if you can convince, I'll vote for Man. But you HAVE to actually give some damn reasons man.
A couple of observations here:
- Sully who's been rather aggressive all game suddenly pumps the breaks and wonders why other players are suspecting Man - I think it's notable that this is really their first attempt at actually defending a player. At every other junction they've been pushing suspicion
- Right when Mando starts to get some heat Sully spearheads the OMB wagon. Drops a post that seems very self aware about how they'll look for the push, not the first preemptive defense they've made either.
- Can't seem to actually decide how they're reading man, is kind of defending them but doesn't really commit to a position and puts the onus on the player who they are suspecting to *prove it* to them.
This shit doesn't make sense. If you're suspecting someone, and you give all the reasons Sally did why the case on them is bunk, this should be a rather slam dunk town read, instead they hesitate, defending-them-while-not-defending them. I see good equity here.