MTG Mafia, Angels vs. Enemies - Game Thread

[Poyser]

Because i dont know who i should vote. I made a decision to not vote my town reads, and not flip flop around and go "oh i'm reading him town" and then vote them 2 seconds later.



Are you shading me being scum or are you just generally making useless comments?

Also in regards your earlier question, why does it matter? Because Rugrat hasn't answered a single question i've asked. Doesn't matter if i'm reading him town or not, he's being uncooperative in the game and i dont like it.

And why should he tell his character? Because everyone else has? Why should Rugrat get a free pass on that when no one else hasn't?

I'm sure someone had to claim character too which people asked about after they just claimed the role. I'm surprised i had to explain this to you.

Also yes there was a hidden agenda wanting to hear him explain which character he is, which also seemed to fly over your head. IF he lied about what character he was by coming up with something from his own head, i could easily just check the character and see if it exists. But thanks to you, that's also now impossible

For smart player like you Poyser, you sometimes just dont see the answer right in front of you.

Also i'm not voting for Brutus, i doubt that's a fake role, it's either Alco or Lawls at this stage, Lawls could prove his role but ofc that would take another turn to do so. And his result could be not even valuable information.

And if somehow it turns out to be Rugrat, well i expect you to take that big L

Why would he make up a character when he has fake characters lmfao that’s dumb as fuck

 

[Poyser]

Also i'm not voting for Brutus, i doubt that's a fake role, it's either Alco or Lawls at this stage, Lawls could prove his role but ofc that would take another turn to do so. And his result could be not even valuable information.

And if somehow it turns out to be Rugrat, well i expect you to take that big L

Why do you think this btw?

 

[Rugrat]

My character is Archway Angel.

I felt Chris was scummy for the interaction Poyser presented. I think final scum is Brutus over Alco

 

[Poyser]

My character is Archway Angel.

I felt Chris was scummy for the interaction Poyser presented. I think final scum is Brutus over Alco

How come?

 

[Banez]

Why would he make up a character when he has fake characters lmfao that’s dumb as fuck

If he's as invested into the game, he would use the fake. If he's not he might just pull something out from his hat.

The possibility for the latter is 10% but it's still an option.

Why do you think this btw?

Because i doubt scum would use a hated fake after beloved was busted. Altho that could be precisely why fake it.

However, you've made multiple statements where you state Haza not being so experienced host, would you think he'd put in hated townie as fake claim for scum?

 

[Banez]

Why are we contemplating Brutus/Alco over Lawls btw?

 

[Poyser]

If he's as invested into the game, he would use the fake. If he's not he might just pull something out from his hat.

The possibility for the latter is 10% but it's still an option.



Because i doubt scum would use a hated fake after beloved was busted. Altho that could be precisely why fake it.

However, you've made multiple statements where you state Haza not being so experienced host, would you think he'd put in hated townie as fake claim for scum?

Lol, it’s not 10%. I don’t think somebody just pulling a character out their ass that doesn’t exist has ever happened in the history of the section

I think he would fake it tbh. As said he faked loved and that’s also a super dumb fake to make lol. I don’t think haza gave them fakes, he seemed to just give them some claimable roles. Which is why brutus might have just pulled a hated fake out of his ass because he didn’t wanna claim vt or something, which is why he claimed loved last time.

In terms of lawls, he looks the best off interactions. The few of his useful posts seemed to be calling out jeff and calling out OMB. And some of his other posts make me think he genuinely didn’t have a clue what was going on lol

 

[Banez]

I think he would fake it tbh. As said he faked loved and that’s also a super dumb fake to make lol. I don’t think haza gave them fakes, he seemed to just give them some claimable roles. Which is why brutus might have just pulled a hated fake out of his ass because he didn’t wanna claim vt or something, which is why he claimed loved last time.

So you think after he claimed loved as scum and it burned him, he'd go with hated this time?

 

[Poyser]

So you think after he claimed loved as scum and it burned him, he'd go with hated this time?

I think it’s possible yeah.

 

[Poyser]

Thing is they’re different situations. What made loved a stupid faked is it’s so easily tested and in 90% of cases should be tested. That’s what he found out when he faked loved. That doesn’t apply to hated because it can’t be tested unless you lynch him.

Thing is, what makes hated a dumb fake is it means you can’t win a 2/1 as scum because if the game is still going then it confirms you as scum (because if you were town then it would only take the scum to vote you). But this isn’t really something I would expect Brutus to be considering

Then again maybe he 4D chess’d me! Because if you work out the numbers for this game then lylo isn’t gonna be a 2/1 it’s gonna be a 3/1 so he wouldn’t have that problem. Again tho, it’s just not soemthing I really expect him to consider lolol

 

[Poyser]

Also the more I think about it the more I think you’re gonna have to make up your mind about lawls tomorrow. You can’t really afford to wait for him to prove his role. You’re either gonna have to trust hes town (or at least decide he’s dead bottom of your PoE and risk losing to him) or lynch him. Because if he’s scum and his role is legit then he’s probably gonna just take evans’ role and then at LyLo he can stop a lynch on himself.

Tho actually, you could negate this by lynching brutus tomorrow.

Yes, I think brutus should be the lynch tomorrow now I think about it. It’s the safety play. Basically you lynch brutus tomorrow and then if lawls doesn’t prove his role you can lynch him at 3/1. Or you can at least decide between lawls and alco the day after without lawls having already won. If he stops his lynch then it doesn’t matter because he has a night kill and you can lynch him again at 2/1. You couldn’t do this with brutus alive obviously because if he’s hated and town then lawls would just win.

 

[Poyser]

Which obviously also means lawls gets the chance to prove his role as a messenger

 

[Poyser]

Has the forum layout changed a bit or have I somehow managed to fuck it up

 

[Banez]

Also the more I think about it the more I think you’re gonna have to make up your mind about lawls tomorrow. You can’t really afford to wait for him to prove his role. You’re either gonna have to trust hes town (or at least decide he’s dead bottom of your PoE and risk losing to him) or lynch him. Because if he’s scum and his role is legit then he’s probably gonna just take evans’ role and then at LyLo he can stop a lynch on himself.

Tho actually, you could negate this by lynching brutus tomorrow.

Yes, I think brutus should be the lynch tomorrow now I think about it. It’s the safety play. Basically you lynch brutus tomorrow and then if lawls doesn’t prove his role you can lynch him at 3/1. Or you can at least decide between lawls and alco the day after without lawls having already won. If he stops his lynch then it doesn’t matter because he has a night kill and you can lynch him again at 2/1. You couldn’t do this with brutus alive obviously because if he’s hated and town then lawls would just win.

Maybe thats why Evans died last night?

 

[Poyser]

Could be yeah, but as I said lynch brutus tomorrow and then he gets the chance to prove his role without that being too big a worry