Neither will I, but I don't think Alco will flip scum similarly to how I was sure Barry wasn't gonna flip scum when everybody decided it had to be him last game.
I know I've been sus of him for most of this phase but his frustration at feeling like there's double standards in play when it comes to people judging his play was genuine, and also I'd hope he wouldn't just throw in the towel like this. The claim is whatever and his play isn't great but idk, I just don't think it's him. I know I'm not getting any credit if I'm right but that's also whatever.
It's me saying I oughta back myself more when I get that sort of feeling.Like to expand, is you saying that you were right about Barry last game a justification based on ability or something?
I know I've been sus of him for most of this phase but his frustration at feeling like there's double standards in play when it comes to people judging his play was genuine, and also I'd hope he wouldn't just throw in the towel like this. The claim is whatever and his play isn't great but idk, I just don't think it's him. I know I'm not getting any credit if I'm right but that's also whatever.
He voted CP and at that time I saw no reason to doubt his judgment. He followed his town reads and I followed mine.
Funny how two people get judged entirely differently off of that.
Like I said previously, if you've got nothing else, multiquote and someone might think you're saying something relevant.he came in bright eyed and bushy tailed this game with a multiquote full of sawdust, just like he did last game. That effort evaporated hilariously quickly though didn’t it?
Just to be sure I don't misread anything: there's two types of votes, right? Locked and normal votes?
Don't wanna pull a TKOK here
Yeah, it’s all in the OP
I like this from Haza. Good entrance!
But then why did you read so closely into rugrat's actions?
I'm here
Oof, I'm gonna need a bit more than that, Chuck.
Isn't that the point of this game, though. You inquire into something you feel is not OK and if it turns out it was OK, then you move on.
And the way I look at it, Sky's fluff-reasoning came late and didn't look in line with the tone of her actual vote.
I think at this point you were only questioned by one guy (OMB), so this is kinda ????
I don't understand this. You think someone scum, but you want to wait for others to show up and vote?
First play-related post by the Tweet
This is quite useful and have made my perception of you evolve in a slightly positive way
Not that I particularly want to defend Gambit here, but I got good vibes from those early Haza posts too
a fence-sitting post disguised to look as activity right here.
Someone claimed VT already?
Ooooof this is some serious self-awareness stuff
On it!
And thank you, my good friend Curry.
I don't even think this is necessarily true lel
Wasn't Rugrat's absence a scum-tell until quite recently?
Unless he's not actually around for that first period of time
I actually like the inquiry by Jeff. Looks like he's actively looking for red flags
Why don't you go into detail over this? You got a hunch on someone but don't want to disclose because... ???
Is it?
You base this town read on... ?
"nailed" is a bit of an overstatement there
Remember how Sky got townread last game (by some) because of her unsolicited "analysis" of OMB's entrances in games?
Feels eerily similar here
I don't know, it'd be nice if he answered some questions at least. I don't think any one player should be exempt of scrutiny.
This is likable.