It's really easy to sit back in my chair and say "Brock wants MORE money for so few dates, are you kidding me?" but really, how much do we know about how much cash a wrestler is worth or payouts or any of that? Hell, WWE doesn't even know.
All I know is this: Throughout 2015, if you take Brock Lesnar out of the picture, how bad of a year would this be? We'd have yet another Cena vs Rollins match instead of that classic we had at the Rumble, which leaves us with an all-time horrible PPV and a utterly forgettable one, right after they just lost their ass on this Network they're betting the future of the company on last year. Hardly the time you want to put on bad PPV's.
If you add Brock Lesnar Germaning the shit out of Fandango or somebody to the Fast Lane card, guarantee you'll enjoy that show more than you did. "But he's useless on Raw" lol, everything's useless on Raw
Whoever thought up the idea should be taken out back and put down, frankly.
"You know those 60 dollar things we beg people to buy each month?"
"Errr, pay per views?"
"Yea, those things"
"What about them?"
"What if we make it so you can buy a network with lots of content for 10 dollars a month?"
"What does this have to do w/ PPVs?"
"We include them on the network!"
"Soooooooooooooooooooooo you want to include something we normally charge $50 for in a package that costs 10 dollars a month?"
"Absolutely, what could go wrong??"
"...."
1:
It was a good idea at the time... kinda.
More people streamed PPV's than buy them - you know that - so the idea least they're getting SOMETHING out of the modern fanbase that would have some affinity for old content... problem is they're overvaluing the shit out of their own content. That'll only satisfy people for so long. After you watch enough of it, what incentive do you have to stay subscribed to the network as opposed to going back to streaming?
And that's the issue with Brock's contract - he can't save this flawed ass Network by himself