Hollywood Dolph'sZiggler said:You may get kicked in the nads or sucker punched but as far as brutality and severe injuries I have serious doubts that rugby is nearly as violent as the NFL.
Of course I am speaking slightly out of ignorance because I have virtually no experience watching high level rugby and have only played it myself a few times. but if you want to have a video-down of NFL vs Rugby violence I'm fairly confident you would eventually agree with me.
You're right. NFL players hit harder than rugby players. That's a fact supported by the NFL, the IRB, and every group that's ever done such a study.
The reason that rugby players don't hit as hard is because they're not wearing pads. When you hit somebody in American football, you don't really feel it (experience is a badass teacher). When you hit somebody in rugby, you feel it just as well as the other guy.
In consequence, there's a much lower incidence of major injuries in rugby than in American football.
So, NFL players hit harder and get injured more often. As a lifelong football player and fan, I'm not sure that makes it a better sport. But, hey, I like watching people pretend to fight each other, too.
wk