Once it's edited after you vote you can't vote again (I think).
Anyway, Zamo I agree you have done the most to get this fed going, and that should give you an automatic spot perhaps on the creative team, but it doesn't mean you should be head booker. As for Jonathan, making one thread is no way enough.
Surely if you're both as passionate as you say about this fed, you'd want the best man in charge. I have no fed experience, hence why I ruled myself out of being any sort of booker, I'll have access to the section anyway obviously so if I choose to chip some creative input I might, but it'd be wrong of me to put myself forward as I have zero experience.
The only people who's proven some worth in this thread is seabs and RKO, both of them have posted examples of their work (sorry if anyone else has, not seen it). @[Zamorakian] and @[Jonathan] , do the same, so we can compare? That's the healthiest way of appointing a "head booker", he who has the most responsibility should deserve it.