Let the Past Die: The Skywalker Saga - A Star Wars Mafia Game Thread

[Evans]

indeed!

 

[Evans]

Here you go, EV.

All of those quotes referencing the role comparison of Informed Townie v Hider claim. Try again.

What contradictions have you tripped me up on other than our discussion in regards to your Informed Townie role v now please?

Receipts would be handy.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

to play devils advocate, arguing semantics is something E-V does on a semi-regular basis as town. So I'm not really putting much stock in that being any sort of tell atm

 

[Bobby Barrows]

I quoted the wrong post.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

 

[Evans]

Btw, regarding the Informed Townie v Hider Claim, I also made this post which clearly explains my thoughts behind it and letting you know that you're making it into a bigger deal than it actually is.

The thing is, you're making a mountain out of a molehill and it's glaringly obvious that people are jumping on me when I'm being pushed by others and there's definitely scum in there somewhere.

You claiming under no pressure at all, knowing you are resigned to an eventual policy lynch is in the exactly the same line as claiming something that benefits town but results in your death and I'll die on that hill lol.

 

[Odo]

What contradictions have you tripped me up on other than our discussion in regards to your Informed Townie role v now please?

Receipts would be handy.

But ... thats where your contradictions are

This is like OJ Simpson saying 'Other than nearly decapitating my wife, what crime am I guilty of? HA!'

 

[Bobby Barrows]

So, there isn't a difference. Thanks.

This is what I meant to post. Yes, there is a difference, which is the contradiction I was pointing out.

 

[Evans]

to play devils advocate, arguing semantics is something E-V does on a semi-regular basis as town. So I'm not really putting much stock in that being any sort of tell atm

I have to. It happens EVERY FUCKING GAME. I post something and it gets twisted apart and turns into something completely different to what I actually said.

 

[Bobby Barrows]

I meant to write more but accidentally hit send. Fuck me in the Alps.

 

[Evans]

This is what I meant to post. Yes, there is a difference, which is the contradiction I was pointing out.

But you said you cited multiple contradictions pal. You've only provided one (the one I said apart from that, what else) over an absolute nothing post which was during a discussion about your claim and your meta.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

breh. again, I asked if you read the op. you really still making a mountain out of a molehill. I think we also need to close this chapter of discussion, because I'm getting to the point where I want to openly mock you for how long you have chosen to drag this out.

me replying to tweet earlier

The thing is, you're making a mountain out of a molehill and it's glaringly obvious that people are jumping on me when I'm being pushed by others and there's definitely scum in there somewhere.

You claiming under no pressure at all, knowing you are resigned to an eventual policy lynch is in the exactly the same line as claiming something that benefits town but results in your death and I'll die on that hill lol.

ev replying to barry

y u copy my points fam-jam

 

[Canadian Dragon]

Also this narrative that everyone hopped on you EV is false, you are at 3 votes.

 

[Bobby Barrows]

But you said you cited multiple contradictions pal. You've only provided one (the one I said apart from that, what else) over an absolute nothing post which was during a discussion about your claim and your meta.

You're arguing semantics. And admittedly, maybe I *should* have said noticed contradictions being noted by other players, and of course the one I pointed out. That doesn't help your argument though, my

 

[Evans]

me replying to tweet earlier



ev replying to barry

y u copy my points fam-jam

Check the times on the posts and get back to me.