Maybe I'm the only one that just-
The more Jeff talks about this certain topic, the more sketchy I feel on him.
Having literally a full quarter of the game's posts as scum would be quite the flex.
Maybe I'm the only one that just-
The more Jeff talks about this certain topic, the more sketchy I feel on him.
Now this makes me question Jeff even more tbh.
The newer players likely did not know that there would be extra player roles, and thus wouldn't be keen to shoot Doddsy based on that logic. I mean most of us assumed it was vanilla.
Having literally a full quarter of the game's posts as scum would be quite the flex.
I'm not sure how putting myself in scums shoes and exploring options is a cause for concern, any good town player shouldn't assume anything unless it's explicitly in the op
I'm not sure how putting myself in scums shoes and exploring options is a cause for concern, any good town player shouldn't assume anything unless it's explicitly in the op
I mean Im mostly confused as what's problematic in my thought process here, last kimgmaker game had roles so obviously I'd consider that in my kill choices in the hypothetical situation as scum. The opposite would be concerning because then I would be ignoring my own experience. Perhaps we're in disagreement on semantics, as I was also simply exploring one of many possibilities as to why doddsy was murdered .
It did tho?The Kingmaker game Chris linked to didn't have roles, though.
Where that assumption of yours came from feels like an important sticking point.
Am I imagining a different game I specifically read a scum flip that had a sneaky assassin n the end game I complained about town roles . I'm legit confused now of I'm mixing up games