Not talking anything out my ass. That was the word going around at the time, as well as the liver issue, but that is what was being reported since Vince had taken off other green monsters like Mordecai from big matches with Taker at PPVs, so what does that show? It was reported by the Torch and Observer, the only credible news sources in the biz with actual contacts within the E. It could have easily been a big diversionary tactic because the WWE wouldn't outright tell anyone that talent was pulled because they stunk. That's just counter productive. It wouldn't be the first time the E fibbed about a worker and they wouldn't shit on a guy that pulls in such a unique demographic as previously mentioned.
And it sounds like your talking out your ass:
So I highly doubt that they would let Khali have a match on ppv against Batista, but pull a match with the Undertaker who is a superior worker than Batista and has had plenty of experience having to work with limited big men on ppv.
Batista didn't wrestle Khali until a FULL YEAR LATER when Khali had enough time to become passable. Trust me, even a seasoned vet like Taker couldn't have made a green Khali passable at that time in 2006, so I can't really get your argument for a match with Batista an entire year later. At least I went on what was being reported at the time, and it makes sense seeing how the E did the same to Kevin Thorne (Mordecai) just two years before. It's quite plausible and you can never really believe what the E reports, so I don't get how I'm talkin out my ass.