Khali... Being wasted?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
250
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
41
and about Umaga, homeboy is wrong. Umaga has been out of the picture because of injuries, not because he hit the wall all monsters hit.
I'm assuming that I'm "homeboy" who is wrong. (jeez I'm feeling to white for this forum right now) Anyways, If you read my previous posts, I have already addressed this. I am well aware of the fact that he has been injured since about the summer time. What I'm saying is that he was already moving down the card and losing pretty much all of his credibility. He's a very one dimensional character. He's a beast that destroys everyone, but when you have been defeated by Cena, Lashley, Triple H, Batista and Jeff Hardy in a year and a half, that whole dominant monster character becomes harder and harder to pull off. I know that there are many people that feel Umaga should be pushed more because they think he's good in the ring for his size, but like I have been saying, this is just the reality for a monster heel.

The E had to remove the guy from a PPV match (Punjabi prison match where Show subbed for him) because they were aware of the absolute atrocity that would have occurred had they let him do a live take.
Where are you getting your information from? To me it seems like you're talking out of your ass. The ppv that you are talking about was the Great American Bash 2006, and the reason that Khali was pulled from the match was because of elevated enzymes in his liver. Bobby Lashley was also pulled from the card for the same reason. Khali did end up having a Punjabi Prison match on ppv just a little over a year later against Batista. So I highly doubt that they would let Khali have a match on ppv against Batista, but pull a match with the Undertaker who is a superior worker than Batista and has had plenty of experience having to work with limited big men on ppv.
 

The Rated R CMStar

Guest
Where are you getting your information from? To me it seems like you're talking out of your ass. The ppv that you are talking about was the Great American Bash 2006, and the reason that Khali was pulled from the match was because of elevated enzymes in his liver. Bobby Lashley was also pulled from the card for the same reason. Khali did end up having a Punjabi Prison match on ppv just a little over a year later against Batista. So I highly doubt that they would let Khali have a match on ppv against Batista, but pull a match with the Undertaker who is a superior worker than Batista and has had plenty of experience having to work with limited big men on ppv.

The actual substitution came when they took Khali vs Undertaker out from the Summerslam card.
 

Quintastic One

Active Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
1,485
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
37
Location
In my beard
Khali won't be getting his future endeavors anytime soon. He's a huge marketing machine in India, and WWE doesn't want to lose any demographic they can get.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
2,923
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
41
Location
Badstreet, USA
Not talking anything out my ass. That was the word going around at the time, as well as the liver issue, but that is what was being reported since Vince had taken off other green monsters like Mordecai from big matches with Taker at PPVs, so what does that show? It was reported by the Torch and Observer, the only credible news sources in the biz with actual contacts within the E. It could have easily been a big diversionary tactic because the WWE wouldn't outright tell anyone that talent was pulled because they stunk. That's just counter productive. It wouldn't be the first time the E fibbed about a worker and they wouldn't shit on a guy that pulls in such a unique demographic as previously mentioned.

And it sounds like your talking out your ass:
So I highly doubt that they would let Khali have a match on ppv against Batista, but pull a match with the Undertaker who is a superior worker than Batista and has had plenty of experience having to work with limited big men on ppv.

Batista didn't wrestle Khali until a FULL YEAR LATER when Khali had enough time to become passable. Trust me, even a seasoned vet like Taker couldn't have made a green Khali passable at that time in 2006, so I can't really get your argument for a match with Batista an entire year later. At least I went on what was being reported at the time, and it makes sense seeing how the E did the same to Kevin Thorne (Mordecai) just two years before. It's quite plausible and you can never really believe what the E reports, so I don't get how I'm talkin out my ass.
 

Beer Money Army

Guest
Great Khali should feud with Mark henry. that could be ***** :shifty:
 

LKP

Guest
Khali can barely walk. Having him in some comedy spots and short matches is good. For him and us watching him, i say he should have gone to ecw during draft and swapped with Finlay. But that aside him not wrestling much and just being on tv and a face is fine with me.