Punk wasn't rumoured at all and the general want was Punk not to win since he has been a lazy crybaby bitch since Summerslam. It was always either Batista or Bryan.
Oh hey, you know trusting random rumors reported out of nowhere or from purported "inside sources" from WWE that were posted on the internet isn't completely stupid amirite?ur dumb ass there many rumor that said punk was facing orton at wm30 and how do I know!? b/c I fuckin report it from sescoops month ago look it up!
Oh hey, you know trusting random rumors reported out of nowhere or from purported "inside sources" from WWE that were posted on the internet isn't completely stupid amirite?
Yeah no. You never trust any dirtsheet site for most of the crap they post. Also, guessing a Wrestlemania card with given context clues is not a hard task. Besides, that's one example of how dirtsheets have "proven" how correct rumors are. You are purely going off information obtained through speculation and therefore have no real argument or basis to complain about Punk's absence.dude sescoops is always almost right on! and there right for the whole card for wm29 8 months before the card was set so yes I do belive he was going in the main event into bastisa resign!
Yeah no. You never trust any dirtsheet site for most of the crap they post. Also, guessing a Wrestlemania card with given context clues is not a hard task. Besides, that's one example of how dirtsheets have "proven" how correct rumors are. You are purely going off information obtained through speculation and therefore have no real argument or basis to complain about Punk's absence.
Also, on another note. If there was to be a surprise at WM 30, I'd much rather hear this
than this.
What is the inside source. Until you can prove me that they have an irrefutable inside source that cannot be argued against, then your argument is wrong and is completely speculative. No one really knows why Punk left, and Shamrock was right in calling him a spoiled brat, because Punk is. SEScoops is not a legitimate source, any online wrestling website can claim that an inside source told them something, and then the internet can just spread it like wildfire. It's not that hard. Find me the inside source, and I might find it believable.UH SESCOOPS DID KNOW! that had an inside source! SO YET UR WRONG AGAIN PUNK GOING UNTIL WWE SIGN BASITSA FACT! and I do have basis b/c that right and u were wrong!
Ken > Punk any day. I'd love to see Punk try to face Ken in MMA, he'd get his sorry ass beaten in a matter of minutes, no seconds.no one care what u think! And like I said I A HUGE FNAS KEN! I would like to Ken return WWE but as this inview clear incake is HHH hate Ken which is why wwe would never bring back!
I'm not going to use an insulting connotation, but let's just say he's not the brightest. As for the forum's troll, that goes to BLFFL.Hm...It's been a while since i've been here(since mp), is this lelouch guy the forum's troll or something?
What is the inside source. Until you can prove me that they have an irrefutable inside source that cannot be argued against, then your argument is wrong and is completely speculative. No one really knows why Punk left, and Shamrock was right in calling him a spoiled brat, because Punk is. SEScoops is not a legitimate source, any online wrestling website can claim that an inside source told them something, and then the internet can just spread it like wildfire. It's not that hard. Find me the inside source, and I might find it believable.
Hm...It's been a while since i've been here(since mp), is this lelouch guy the forum's troll or something?
Sureeee, you can say that about ANY rumor website out there. Hell, I could even be as daring to call Dave Meltzer legitimate. Until you give me and half of the people on the site evidence that SEScoops is legit with REAL sources, then they aren't legit.sescoops is legitimate DUMB ASS!