Did both James Storm and Robert Roode deserve the world title? One/Both??? This a new day for Impact Wrestling?
Personally i like Roode a bit more than James Storm, however i'm not sure if either of these guys are ready to lead Impact wrestling based on the build to Bound for Glory. Realistically speaking there is a reason why Robert Roode did not win at Bound for Glory, and giving the belt to storm, only to have him drop it back to Roode just seems like a lack of direction and confidence on Impact wrestlings behalf. I think Roode has all the tools to be a good world champ one day, i just wonder if TNA could have done a little more to build him up.
I also have to wonder if Crimson would have been a better choice, soley based on the build up alone. I think it would have been a good storyline, where Crimson was dominating the BFG series, than Angle takes him out of action for a month, however Crimson comes back a little early, and ends up winning the title shot. Would have made better build imo, rather than sticking Roode in the ring with Angle. I don't know if Crimson has the tools to carry the torch, but from what i've seen thus far, i kinda like the guy.
Realistically to rewrite history, you would have to go a ways back, but TNA has made some interesting moves.
What do you think?
Personally i like Roode a bit more than James Storm, however i'm not sure if either of these guys are ready to lead Impact wrestling based on the build to Bound for Glory. Realistically speaking there is a reason why Robert Roode did not win at Bound for Glory, and giving the belt to storm, only to have him drop it back to Roode just seems like a lack of direction and confidence on Impact wrestlings behalf. I think Roode has all the tools to be a good world champ one day, i just wonder if TNA could have done a little more to build him up.
I also have to wonder if Crimson would have been a better choice, soley based on the build up alone. I think it would have been a good storyline, where Crimson was dominating the BFG series, than Angle takes him out of action for a month, however Crimson comes back a little early, and ends up winning the title shot. Would have made better build imo, rather than sticking Roode in the ring with Angle. I don't know if Crimson has the tools to carry the torch, but from what i've seen thus far, i kinda like the guy.
Realistically to rewrite history, you would have to go a ways back, but TNA has made some interesting moves.
What do you think?