I'm drawing the line in the sand. Which side are you on?

[the dark knight]

That is the job of a critic and they get paid to do it.

And yes it does. Why are you watching something you're not enjoying?

because they are critic wanna-bes. but yea i get your point. if they dont get paid for it, they are sheep...depends on how you define it tbh.

How? I don't give a fuck if I'm being analytical. If a damn show that is suppose to have a tag team division doesn't, I'm going to point it out. Because it is failing to entertain me, as I was giving you a reason for me saying TNA iMPACT entertains me more than SD or ECW usually.

YOU liking impact more than SD and ECW, and TNA being better than the WWE are different things. if you're analyzing trying to explain how the show entertains YOU more, i dont mind. but if you're analyzing them as WRESTLING COMPANIES and not entertainment television shows, thats what i dont like.

 

[PeepShow]

because they are critic wanna-bes. but yea i get your point. if they dont get paid for it, they are sheep...depends on how you define it tbh.


YOU liking impact more than SD and ECW, and TNA being better than the WWE are different things. if you're analyzing trying to explain how the show entertains YOU more, i dont mind. but if you're analyzing them as WRESTLING COMPANIES and not entertainment television shows, thats what i dont like.

Thats what everyone does. It just then branches out to them then saying that this company is better overall. It all comes from what they like. DUR

 

[monkeystyle]

Some people however don't seem to be able to make the distinction between what they like and what they think everybody should like.

 

[the dark knight]

Thats what everyone does. It just then branches out to them then saying that this company is better overall. It all comes from what they like. DUR

what? what you just said made no sense at all.

Some people however don't seem to be able to make the distinction between what they like and what they think everybody should like.

exactly

 

[Great One]

YOU liking impact more than SD and ECW, and TNA being better than the WWE are different things. if you're analyzing trying to explain how the show entertains YOU more, i dont mind. but if you're analyzing them as WRESTLING COMPANIES and not entertainment television shows, thats what i dont like.

The tag team division is a real division on the show which use to entertain me...

 

[the dark knight]

^^i know. i can understand that from a fan's point of view. but you still cant say TNA is a better wrestling company than WWE for that reason...

 

[Great One]

I never did... lol.

 

[the dark knight]

I never did... lol.

talkin about others maybe? i just generalize..

 

[Australian Badass]

I would call myself an intelligent fan.

 

[Rell]

^^i know. i can understand that from a fan's point of view. but you still cant say TNA is a better wrestling company than WWE for that reason...

But its not about a company being "better" than another, its about a person liking a company over another. Its not like we're "supposed" to like one or the other, people watch with they like. Some of you make it seem like if you like anything over WWE you're wrong, but fail to realize its not about being right or wrong, its about watching what you like. Some watch WWE over TNA, others watch TNA over WWE, There is really nothing to fight about.

 

[Reinvented]

But its not about a company being "better" than another, its about a person liking a company over another. Its not like we're "supposed" to like one or the other, people watch with they like. Some of you make it seem like if you like anything over WWE you're wrong, but fail to realize its not about being right or wrong, its about watching what you like. Some watch WWE over TNA, others watch TNA over WWE, There is really nothing to fight about.

Peace Not War!
I agree with all of the above!