Well I cant speak on the other stuff, but I will speak on myself.
I dont watch much TNA or WWE but its obvious most ROH fans do. Hell, I remember the other day you (TDK) were complaining because I don't post in the "wrestling sections" which are most likely TNA & WWE. The reason is because I don't pay attention to them so why post in the sections. I'm not one of those fans that piss & moan aout something I don't like, if I dislike it, I dont watch it. Simple as that, no need to talk about why I hate it 24/7.
now, I still need time to read the rest of the post so I can add my two cents...continue :08:
i never complained that you dont post in the wrestling section. well, i did imply it lol. but look at the bright side, you started posting more. and by wrestling section i dont mean TNA and WWE. i see your name everyday in the indys and ROH sections. but that wasn't my point..all you did for some time is spam in hiat and the shitbox lol.
Just for the record, TNA iMPACT is a hell of a lot more entertaining to me than ECW or SD. But yeah, it's all a matter of appeal. The WWE doesn't really try to appeal to the same people the same way they did back in the late 90's early 2000's, which is sad but the truth. I think TNA tries to appeal to those people, but they kinda fail at it, ROH is probably more accurate.
TNA actually put some fucking effort into their tag team division (as well as their women's but I could careless about that).
lets start with impact being better than smackdown and ECW. well, at some points it was. but mostly, it wasn't. i did think that impact was way better in the summer though. smackdown sucked big time and ecw wasn't much after we saw 3 matches of morrison vs punk.
2nd, you see? this is why we should all shut up and stop analyzing everything. its just a matter of appeal. you post your opinion, i post mine to see what others like. but to some people its a NO. we must watch and believe that a certain company and its shows are better than the other. and in their case, if they're really comparing them with facts. again, there is no way that impact would be better than any WWE brand. even ecw..
also, its kinda contradicting to say that its all a matter of appeal then compare divisions. even if you're an analysist, this isn't a real sport to compare the divisions here. they are television SHOWS. they're taken on a whole...not divisions.
So are you saying, if you watch every week good or bad, that makes you a sheep? and you cannot be a intelligent fan?
I doubt very many people would admit to being a sheep, but i would say im a wrestling fan, and i watch wrestling, good or bad. Now if its bad wrestling, generally if something else better is goin on ill go do that. But in general, i watch a lot of wrestling, wheather its taped or not. Monday night raw, is probably the only i watch on a weekly basis, but idk if i would call myself a sheep for that. I generally try and tape it, if i miss it. Mainly because i dont watch much else on television. So call it what you will.....
see monk, this why i'd change the question. right there is a pure example of a guy who is "so obsessed with wrestling". he is not a fan anymore like as he claims. watching every show even if you dont like it doesn't necessarily mean you're a sheep. cuz by the same standard critics are sheep....
