HALLOWEEN - Slashing Through History

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


James Bond

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
243
Reaction score
25
Points
18
Age
33
Location
Wisconsin
Favorite Wrestler
shawnmichaels
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk5
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Here we go again. Another series review thread. I love doing these though, and this time, I've picked my favorite franchise of all time, the HALLOWEEN series. Here, we'll look at everything from the 1978 classic, through that piece of trash Resurrection and the heavily debated Zombie redux and its sequel. I'll again use my signature rating system, with certain critiques aimed at the series in particular.

As per usual, each will be linked right back to this post for quick access. I'm not sure what ranking lists I'll be able to come up with, but we'll see. It'll be harder than some other series, but maybe we'll be able to rank some neat stuff. Like top kills, and whatnot.

Halloween (1978)
Halloween II (1981)
Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982)
Halloween IV: The Return of Michael Myers (1988)
Halloween V: The Revenge of Michael Myers (1989)
Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995)
Halloween H2O: 20 Years Later (1998)
Halloween: Resurrection (2002)
Halloween (2007)
Halloween II (2009)
BONUS - Halloween: Extended Edition (1978/1981)
BONUS - Halloween II: The Television Cut (1981)
BONUS - Halloween VI: The Origin of Michael Myers (1995)
BONUS - Rob Zombie's Halloween: Unrated Director's Cut (2007)
BONUS - Rob Zombie's Halloween II: Unrated Director's Cut (2009)



CURRENT RANKINGS:
1. Halloween (1978) - 97
2. Halloween IV: The Return of Michael Myers (1988) - 96
3. Halloween II (1981) - 90
4. Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982) - 87
5. Halloween VI: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995) - 86
6. Halloween V: The Revenge of Michael Myers (1989) - 81

NOTE: March 29, 2012 - The thread has been rebooted and re-posted after it was lost in the board crash. Anyone who is interested in the thread or has been waiting, thank you for your patience. Now that it's back up, it's here to stay.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Smart Marx

Israel Has the Right to Exist
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
176,961
Reaction score
36,961
Points
148
Age
38
Location
Wrestling Forums
Website
wrestlingsmarks.com
Favorite Wrestler
emma
Favorite Wrestler
YA1yyED
Favorite Wrestler
frmoJZU
Favorite Wrestler
nock3cf
Favorite Wrestler
danielbryan3
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Sports Team
WYT3shw
Favorite Sports Team
fRXTMaD
Favorite Sports Team
LechI0u
Favorite Sports Team
RHZ7KJg
I can't wait for your review of Halloween 4. Glad this is back and it's good seeing you around these parts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

James Bond

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
243
Reaction score
25
Points
18
Age
33
Location
Wisconsin
Favorite Wrestler
shawnmichaels
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk5
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
HALLOWEEN (1978)

halloween_1_poster_04-Copy.jpg


It was late 1978 when the movie world would be rattled by the sudden success of a low budget sleeper hit titled, "HALLOWEEN." No one saw it coming, but the film would go on to be, for a time, the most successful independent film of all time, grossing over $70 million on its shoestring budget of around $300,000. The film would inspire a massive series that still carries a huge, incredibly devoted fanbase, who by now have examined each film inside and out, forward and back. Currently, the series sits at 10 films and a comic book series. As of now, there is an 11th film sitting in pre-production.

After viewing Carpenter's 1976 sleeper "Assault On Precinct 13", producer Irwin Yablans crafted the idea of a horror film, with Carpenter as his choice to helm it. He put together the simplest idea, for babysitters to be stalked and killed. Yablans recalls, "I wanted to make a film with the same kind of impact as 'The Exorcist'". Carpenter and his production partner Debra Hill began working on the script while Yablans contacted legendary producer Moustapha Akkad about the budget. After recieving a $320,000 budget, Yablans suggested to Carpenter that the film be set on Halloween ... and the choice helped make the film all the more iconic. Carpenter specialized in writing the darker dialogue while Hill wrote the lines for the film's teenage characters. In the end, they had a very simple script that would become so much more.

Shot in 21 days in Pasadena, California, Halloween was fronted by Hollywood star Donald Pleasence in the role of Dr. Loomis, the mad doctor chasing the film's villain, Michael Myers. Then unknown actress Jamie Lee Curtis was attached to the film's lead role as Laurie Strode. P.J. Soles and Charles Cyphers were the other big roles. Carpenter and crew dressed Pasadena as a traditional Midwest town during the fall season, using houses in quiet neighborhoods for most of the shoot, Carpenter and Dean Cundey (cinematographer) used light to their advantage through almost every shot. Shortly after, Carpenter cut together a 92 minute film. He showed it to an executive, who claimed it was not scary in the least. Carpenter went back and composed a very simple, very eerie score and showed the new cut to the executive, who couldn't believe it was the same film.

Given a limited release in Kansas City, Missouri, the film would push on to bigger cities, new audiences, and would impress a number of critics (though not at first). It became a low budget sleeper in late 1978, pulling in at least $47 million in the United States, and approximately $23 million internationally.

Still today, and number of people hold Halloween as arguably the greatest horror film ever released. We're about to find out whether that title is rightly deserved.



snapshot20090414122829.jpg

"Michael?"

snapshot20090414123858.jpg

"There's someone behind the bush ..."

snapshot20090414124739.jpg

"What, can't I get your ghost, Bob?"

snapshot20090414125008.jpg

Just an example of Carpenter's brilliant use of shadow.

snapshot20090414125528.jpg

"As a matter of fact, it was."


RATINGS:
Story - 98
Fifteen years ago, when Michael Myers was 6 years old, he brutally massacred his sister in cold blood. For those many years, town residents have rested easy knowing he was locked away. Now, after escaping from his mental hospital, he’s back to relive his grisly crime again, and again … and again.
Atmosphere - 100
This one depends on which transfer of the film you’re watching really. First I’ll just say that it’s a solid fall atmosphere no matter which transfer, but if we’re really trying to be accurate: The original film shown in theaters was mostly washed clean with nearly no color filters on any of its scenes. There were slight blue and orange hints throughout. This look gives the film a very cold Autumn feel that certainly got the job done for many, many years. When the film was released in its 1999 limited edition, TXH and Dean Cundey remastered the transfer, and Cundey took advantage to color the film the way he and Carpenter had intended in 1978. The results were day scenes drenched in orange hues and night scenes drowned in a beautiful blue filter. Some still feel that the blues went overboard, but it’s all personal opinion there. However, in 2003, the most controversial transfer of the film yet showed up on the DiviMax special edition dvd, in which the colors were COMPLETELY washed out. Even more so than the original look. Many fans backlashed against this look, and I have to agree that it’s a little TOO dry. In 2007, a blu-ray version of the film was released that features the closest transfer to the original film, with slight blue tinges at night and most of the orange from the Cundey transfer. Depending on how you like your fall scenes to look, choosing a transfer may be tough. But all in all, the atmosphere gets the job done in each one.
Acting - 99
This film is one of very few where I feel that EVERY SINGLE character was perfectly cast. No-names or not, they all played their parts to perfection. Seriously, everyone from Curtis and Pleasence to little Brian Andrews and John Michael Graham, every role in the film is acted as if these actors’ lives depended on perfection. Jamie Lee Curtis is completely believable as the virgin teen who is being tuned in to a lurking evil, the legendary Pleasence was unbelievable (the good way) as the raving Dr. Loomis, P.J. soles was TOTALLY awesome as the preppy high-school cheerleader, Charles Cyphers sizzled opposite the mad doctor, and Nancy Loomis was strangely comfortable in her spot as the ditzy girl who has no idea what’s actually going on around her.
Pacing - 95
The film bustles along quickly and every moment of it keeps you on your seat. It owes a lot to great characters, and Carpenter’s cinematography, but after the credits roll, you can’t find yourself feeling as though any of the film was really boring, because nothing was. Everything was placed perfectly and keeps the film moving along.
Music - 100
Anyone reading this thread, fan of the film or not, must tip their hat, first and foremost, to John Carpenter for adding one last bit of brilliance to the film … the score. I honestly can’t imagine where this film would have ended up or how dead it would have been without its haunting piano stings and amazing Halloween theme that still sends chills down my spine. Every second of music to be found on this film’s score is perfectly fitted to the action it is matching on screen. How often do you see that? I’ll go ahead and answer it … not very. Laurie’s theme also remains a favorite of fans of the series, although the series in general would see an absence of it in many of the films.
Cinematography - 100
Every single shot in this film was incredibly staged by Carpenter, which is strange considering it was a low-budget sleeper shot on a limited schedule. Everything from The Shape lurking behind a bush to his final fade from darkness behind Laurie, Carpenter and crew used location, lighting and shadows to their advantage and the result is breathtaking. Particularly striking is the aforementioned final shade from darkness, in which Laurie throws herself against a doorframe in despair, only to have the Shape fade slowly out of the shadows behind her and attack her. It’s a remarkable few seconds as the mask fades from obscurity into view. The limited view of the Shape due to his lurking in shadows was never again matched in the entire series, no matter how hard every writer and director tried.
Dialogue - 95
Dr. Loomis’ dialogue pounds into our minds how dangerous his escaped patient is, while Laurie, Annie and Lynda’s dialogue demonstrates that these characters actually have lives, and they’re not just one dimensional characters thrown into the film just for the sake of having teenage characters to slaughter. Lynda’s dialogue in particular is hilarious, especially when she’s with her goofy boyfriend Bob, and had a few drinks in her.
Effects - 90
There isn’t a whole lot of blood to be seen in this film. To be honest, there’s nearly none. Maybe a bit of blood when Judith is killed and a wee bit on Annie’s neck after The Shape slits her throat. That’s about all I can recall seeing. Halloween is a champion of less is more, and that’s a good thing. It had more important things to do, like drive the plot. The champion effect in the film is to see Bob hanging on the door after the Shape dispatches of him.
The Shape/Michael Myers - 100
Ah, the original Shape. How we miss thee. This creature of the night lurked in the shadows, toyed with his victims and actually had a serious PASSION for what he was doing. Listen to his forceful breathing as he strangles a certain victim. That’s one thing that became a lost art after this film when filmmakers became far more concerned with trying to top the former film’s kills with over the top gore, effects and murder weapons. It’s a shame really, because The Shape was intended to be a killer who was in it for the thrill.
Scares - 97
Numerous scares in the film burn with proper intensity and induce jumping. For example, as Nurse Chambers sits in the car waiting for Loomis towards the beginning, The Shape leaps and scrambles on top of the car in a well executed startle. There are a few subtle scares as Laurie is in school and gazes out the window to see The Shape standing across the road. She looks again and he’s staring RIGHT AT HER. It’s chill inducing. There are also tons of moments where the Shape steps into frame that are accompanied by a sting on the score that are sure to make jumpers jump.
Lead Character - 100
Laurie Strode is a great lead character simply for the fact that she’s paying attention enough to know that something is amiss on this dark Halloween night. As mentioned earlier, her dialogue really brings her character to life even as we learn she doesn’t have much of one outside of school and babysitting. Things were about to turn around for her.
Kills - 95
We have some pretty simple ones here as the Shape stabs, slits and strangles his victims to death. The difference between this film and all its copycats are the executions (no pun intended) of the kill scenes, as Halloween triumphs due to its killer’s dedication and admiration of his craft.
TOTAL POINTS - 1169/1200
OVERALL - 97 (97.42)


There you have it. Halloween is one of the all time greats in terms of horror films, and quite possibly the most influential. Even Hitchcock's Psycho didn't start a slasher film revolution the way Halloween did. A slew of imitators came along quickly ... some good, some just plain awful. At the end of the day though, even being the first review of the series, it seems safe to say that it could top the mountain with a score of 97. The film’s legacy lives on and it is aired on TV religiously for new generations to discover. Whether you like the film or not, you have got to respect the impact it made and the doors it opened that have led to today's horror films. Thank you, John Carpenter.

Until next time, The Nightmare Isn’t Over

Michael Myers, watching silently from the shadows.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

James Bond

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
243
Reaction score
25
Points
18
Age
33
Location
Wisconsin
Favorite Wrestler
shawnmichaels
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk5
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
HALLOWEEN II (1981)

halloween_ii_xlg-Copy.jpg


It's 1981. It has been 3 years since Michael Myers made a huge splash on screens everywhere. Fans everywhere are clamoring for a sequel, but creators John Carpenter and Debra Hill refused to venture into the territory. Carpenter finally gave way and began to throw out ideas for the sequel. The initial plans were for it to be set a few years after the original and have Michael Myers track Laurie to her high rise apartment, but the idea was scrapped. Finally, Carpenter caved while out drinking and crafted the story for the sequel. He and Hill worked out a screenplay, but Carpenter refused to direct, claiming, "I had done that film once, and I really didn't want to do it again." After viewing a short film called "Toyer," John Carpenter picked Rick Rosenthal to hand the torch to.

Rosenthal took the film to heart and tried to craft a suspenseful thriller much in vein of Carpenter's original film. His intent was to make it feel much like the second half of one film. He may have succeeded, but Carpenter saw his rough cut and stepped in, filming many gorier sequences, succumbing to the 1980's horror style. Rosenthal was not pleased with Carpenter's changes, claiming that "he ruined my carefully paced film." Rosenthal's version to this day has not been seen, but there is a television version which can be assumed to be CLOSER.

On October 30, 1981, the film was released to much commercial success, though not even close to as much as the first film; and much critical searing to go along with it. While critics rip the film to shreds, many fans clung to it as a great sequel. Notably, future Halloween scribe Alan McElroy. Today, many fans still hold it as one of the highest up sequels in slasher history. Let's take a look, and see if it holds up.



4835_2_1080p.jpg

"Michael Myers is twenty-one."

4835_11_1080p.jpg

"A girl was killed in Haddonfield."

4835_12_1080p.jpg

"The little kid who killed his sister?"

4835_17_1080p.jpg

Uh ... ouch!

4835_19_1080p.jpg

"Screeeeeeech ... CRASH!"


RATINGS
Story - 90
Picking up precisely where its predecessor left off, Laurie Strode is taken to the local hospital. However, the inhuman Michael Myers is still very much alive and out for more thrilling kills as he stalks the deserted halls of the hospital where his terrifying target lays waiting. As he gets closer and closer, Dr. Loomis discovers the chilling secret behind the crazed psychopath’s actions.
Atmosphere - 92
What a choice Carpenter made … to place this film inside a hospital. It starts out as a dark enough location before the power goes out, which plunges this hospital into a beautiful color pallet of numerous dark colors, aiding to the use of shadow to hide the villain. There are a few shots where light from outside the hospital is leaking in the window, which drenches that respective room in a nice light blue color. The shots outside towards the beginning of the film don’t really help, and they don’t take much away. The rest of the night shots are plunged in black, void of any color filter, giving it a great cold feel. There’s also a nice morning scene at the end which is grey-ish and drowned in a nasty fog … wonderful.
Acting/Characters - 87
This was the early 1980’s. In other words, the acting isn’t amazing. On the plus side, it’s very solid for an early 80’s horror film. Donald Pleasence is brilliant again, Charles Cyphers delivers solid as a rock (for the few minutes he's involved), Hunter Von Leer steps in to replace Cyphers’ character and does a great job, Lance Guest is incredibly likeable in his role as an orderly, and many of the nurses deliver on their end. Jamie Lee Curtis is solid in her part, but she’s not given much to do besides lay around and crawl/limp on one leg.
Pacing - 85
The film doesn’t quite keep the action bustling along like its predecessor did, as we hit a few dead moments, but for the most part, it’s pretty solid. A lot of the scares are spaced out just a hair too far to make way for the drama/romance angles that were worked into the script. Thankfully, one of those romance angles turns into a disaster once the scare arrives to save the day. On the plus side, nearly every moment that Dr. Loomis is on screen is quite lively, and help to keep things moving.
Music - 87
Halloween series, meet ALAN HOWARTH. Alan Howarth worked closely with John Carpenter on the score to the film, which kicks off with a sparkly new version of the now iconic Halloween Theme. This time it’s played on a synthesizer, which many fans claim to have given the cue a more “gothic” feel. I can’t argue that it makes it a bit darker sounding, but it doesn’t quite compare to the chilling piano found on the 1978 original’s score. The film also makes large use of Laurie’s Theme, as well as an interesting choice of “Mr. Sandman” by the Chordettes. Some question it, some love it. I purely see it as an interesting choice.
Cinematography - 94
The film is shot once again by Dean Cundey… let me just say that the man is a GENIOUS. He again uses neat little shots to keep an eye on Michael Myers as he trudges his way through Haddonfield Memorial. One of my personal favorites of the series - one of the nurses comes looking for the missing security guard and he’s nowhere to be found. She wanders out through a door to look for him as the camera pans down to the security monitor to show Michael walking down a hallway and entering a room. Cue the nurse, who comes back looking for the security guard, as if he’s shown up in those few seconds. She leaves off screen and we pan back down to the monitor, where she shows up in the same hallway that we just saw Michael in. Brilliance!!! Let’s not skip around it - no one shot horror better in the 80’s than Dean Cundey.
Dialogue - 92
The dialogue from most characters does its purpose and drives the film along. One big note is the fact that Laurie Strode barely speaks a complete sentence during the entire runtime. However, the dialogue from many other characters comes across believable and sometimes very funny. Leo Rossi’s Bud character is one example. At one point, he sings his own version of “Amazing Grace” and it’s hilarious. He also pushes his character across as the sex obsessed character, and for some reason, it comes across as believable dialogue. On that note, most of the dialogue in the hospital works to good effect, as all the hospital personnel are relied upon to drive the story forward. I’m not sure what John Carpenter was thinking by all of a sudden having the Loomis character ranting and raving after he was completely calm when we last left him in the first film. This time around, he’s screaming and shouting in a completely ridiculous manner, but I guess that’s just another thing we love about Dr. Loomis.
Effects - 90
The big effect comes during the therapy pool scene, and it’s convincing. A character’s skin is completely scalded, and supposedly they just used Vaseline. It creates an incredible look of skin burnt and peeled. There are also needles penetrating skin and a few blood gags, which all look great on screen, even though the original was nearly blood free.
The Shape/Michael Myers - 89
Dick Warlock would play the character for the sequel, and takes almost nothing from Nick Castle’s performance in the film previous to him. Dick walks much slower and stiffer, but does bring with him the heavy breathing and the iconic head tilt. The slower walk, some will argue, can be blamed on the fact that the character was stabbed and shot to end the first film. The Shape in this film is much different from the one in the first film in quite a few ways. This one doesn’t stay hidden in the shadows as much as he did before, but instead prowls through a lighted hospital. This killer also has a motive now, something he didn’t have in the first. To be honest, it’s not quite the best motive they could have come up with, but what’s done is done, and it laid the groundwork for some of the sequels to come, which is something I myself can’t complain about.
Scares - 90
The film utilizes a few false scares, like a cat jumping out at a character. However, the film would also fire back strongly with a few Shape scares, like the Shape bursting out at a victim, or appearing behind a door all of a sudden. Most of them are accompanied by musical stings like they were in the first film, to great effect.
Lead Character - 92
Once again we have Laurie Strode, whom I have no issues with. What I do have an issue with, however … is the fact that she barely completes one sentence the whole film. Her lines, as aforementioned, are dumbed down the one or two words that don’t help push her character along very well. Besides those points, she’s bedridden due to the events of the first film. Well, that’s a good way to keep her interesting. Oh wait, she gets out of the bed, trying to hide from Michael Myers. Great! She’s back. Ugh, she runs into yet another facepalm when Dr. Loomis arrives and she can somehow NOT summon the energy to scream to alert him to her. Well, damn. Oh look, after he gets in the hospital, she SCREAMS. Excellent. Well, this is a mixed bag of Laurie Strode, but she’s a good enough character to rate pretty high.
Kills - 94
The kills in the film fall subject to the early 1980’s blood gag kills, which all tried to top each other. Where as in the original, The Shape used very simple methods to take down his victims, this time he has numerous tools at his disposal. Among them are his chosen favorite, the scalpel. He utilizes the slit throat a few times, drains a victim of blood, stabs one with a needle, stabs one with a needle in the EYE, takes a hammerclaw to one’s head, and also stabs one in the back with a scalpel, proceeding to lift the victim from the floor using the scalpel, before the victim crashes to the floor.
TOTAL POINTS - 1082/1200
OVERALL - 90 (90.16)


Well, look at that. A very strong part II. It remains one of my favorites in the series, and holds the same right in the hearts of numerous Halloween fans. The film would help to launch Halloween to unseen heights, and would bring forth another sequel just a year later, but we'll get to that.

The film features many of the Halloween signatures while venturing further into gory slasher territory that really started with the hordes of slashers inspired by this film's predecessor. How ironic. However, it's dark and chilling enough to be considered a strong film, and a strong film it is.

Until next time, The Nightmare Isn't Over

Michael Myers, watching silently from the shadows.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

James Bond

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
243
Reaction score
25
Points
18
Age
33
Location
Wisconsin
Favorite Wrestler
shawnmichaels
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk5
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
HALLOWEEN III: Season of the Witch

halloween_3_xlg-Copy.jpg


In 1982, after the massive success of Halloween II, Carpenter and company decided to take the series a new route after the “deaths” of their characters Michael Myers and Dr. Loomis. The plan this time around was to create an anthology Halloween-themed films using Halloween mythos and history as backbones for the stories. This was the only way Carpenter and Debra Hill would commit to the project.

Nigel Kneale was brought in to write a screenplay, which he claimed “didn’t have horror for horror’s sake”. It wasn’t long after when alterations were made to the script, angering Kneale, who requested to be dropped altogether. While much of his story was kept, Tommy Lee Wallace altered the script further to the point of the film we have now. Wallace was attached as director and recruited a number of series veterans to help him put this new Halloween vision in motion.

The finished film was released on October 22, 1982. It was quickly ripped to shreds by critics, and the box office didn’t fare much better. On its budget of $2.5 million, the film pulled in $14,400,000. While not a complete failure, it didn’t perform as expected and the rest of the anthology idea was shelved. In 1982’s horror scene, the film was outperformed by many, including Poltergeist, Friday the 13th Part 3, and Creepshow.
There were a few critics who praised the film, and a number of fans have created a cult following for the film, claiming it as one of the top entries. Which side wins this argument? Let’s take a gander, shall we?



H3Screen4.jpg

"Where do you WANT to sleep, Dr. Challis?"

H3Screen5.jpg

That’s gonna hurt in the morning.

H3Screen1.jpg

“(DON’T) Watch the magic pumpkin!”

H3Screen3.jpg

“And … happy Halloween.”

H3Screen2.jpg

"Turn it off! Stop it! STOP IT!!!”


RATINGS
Story - 85
An apparent murder-suicide in a hospital emergency room leads to an investigation by the on-call doctor, which reveals a plot by an insane toymaker to kill as many people as possible during Halloween through an ancient Celtic ritual involving a stolen boulder from Stonehenge and Halloween masks.
Atmosphere - 87
Halloween III, like its predecessors, features a strong fall color pallet to support the Halloween season, even though the film is set in California. The night scenes are doused in a slight blue tinge, but nothing like we’ve seen in the others. The atmosphere gets a bit more chilling once they arrive in Santa Mira, as the small, isolated town looks beautiful with its orange hued days and dark night scenes. In the end, it’s not quite as strong as the looks presented in H1 or H2, but that can be attributed to this one not being set in the Midwest. California’s fall season obviously won’t look exactly like one in Illinois, so maybe the lighter use of the colors is appropriate.
Acting/Characters - 88
Dr. Dan Challis is an interesting character, and he’s played on a drunken nervous edge by Tom Atkins. Atkins does a great job playing a jumpy character who’s made some bad choices and is stuck alone until he meets Ellie. On that note, Ellie is played wonderfully by Stacey Nelkin. She’s incredibly likeable, and she carries that note of sympathy after her father dies. Then there’s Conal Cochran. This man is played by Dan O’Herlihy to a great effect. The Irishman plays the character with a nice sense of gentlemanly conduct, which makes you wonder if he’s really that bad of a guy. Some may contend, but I found the acting in Halloween III to be above average, mostly on the part of the three main characters.
Pacing - 85
The film moves along nicely but some shots are sustained for an overextended period of time with nothing happening on screen. Luckily, these are kept to a minimum and the film is able to push its plot forward with a good hustle. Once the characters start to unravel the mystery in Santa Mira, the pace seems to pick up, even though it takes up most of the film. To that extent, it’s not perfect, but it’s not a drag either.
Music - 87
Halloween III features another synthesizer score from Carpenter and Howarth. This time, it’s a completely original score that is dark, mystifying and suiting to the film. The music over the opening credits is a perfect example. There’s also the bizarre bounce of the Silver Shamrock theme, which is heard a number of times, accompanying the “London Bridge” tune for Silver Shamrock’s commercial. On the whole, it’s another great score for the series, if a little odd. At this point, it’s no wonder Howarth kept getting the call for the next couple Halloween films. He’s really a great composer, and this film shows it.
Cinematography - 90
Dean Cundey returns to the series for the final time, and once again shoots a wonder of a film. Without Cundey’s work on this film, it may have been nothing. His unique angles and use of lighting and shadow is ever-present, as always. Cundey’s final contribution to the series hangs largely on his shots and the way things can be revealed in shots. It’s a wonder he wasn’t invited back for future installments, but that’s the way the industry is. Dean, thank you for your wonderful work on the first three installments.
Dialogue - 87
The dialogue in this film definitely does its purpose to push the film along, but also does a nice job of revealing some chracters’ backstories. Like Challis. We learn that he’s got a history of alcohol use and that he wasn’t the best husband or father. On the other hand, I find the best dialogue in the film to come from Cochran, especially his rant about the history of Halloween. It’s a great touch towards the end of the film. My only complaint is that Ellie doesn’t have much to say. It would have been great if she’d had more to say to keep her character in focus.
Effects - 90
Here we have some GREAT early 80’s effects, including lasers, fake heads, and insects crawling out of prosthetic bodies. Everything looks great and the gore isn’t overdone, but it all looks believable. My favorite is the laser that shoots out of the Silver Shamrock pin. It’s completely unexpected, but it honestly looks good in the final film. The insects and snakes coming out of a corpse’s mouth are quite unsettling, to say the least.
Scares - 85
The film again utilizes a few false scares, like characters scaring other characters. However, it comes back strong with one of the best scares in the series with what Silver Shamrock calls a “misfire”. It’s a great scare that comes out of nowhere. There’s also the moments where Cochran’s henchmen burst out of the darkness or break into the cameraframe. Another great scare comes towards the end when Challis questions an old woman of Ellie’s whereabouts. She doesn’t respond and Challis shakes her. The result is a bit startling, but it also creates a laugh. There’s nothing wrong with a scare that induces a small, nervous laugh.
Lead Character - 90
Challis and Ellie share the spotlight, and they’re characters you can pull for. They’re trying to get to the bottom of things and trying to stop a terrible fate from coming over everyone. Of course, they fall for each other along their journey and create a steamy scene that could have been a lot steamier. On the whole, both are good characters to drive the film with, and it’s tragic that one of them doesn’t make it until the end of the film.
Kills - 87
There isn’t an overabundance of kills in the movie. But the ones we have are particularly striking. The kills in this one are justified, showing what Cochran’s henchmen can do, such as pulling a head off, or driving a drill into a head … now that I notice it, almost every death in the film has something to do with someone’s head.
TOTAL POINTS - 961/1100
OVERALL - 87 (87.36)


That looks about right. The film isn’t a masterpiece, but it’s a welcome addition to the series overall. It’s dark, thrilling in many parts, and overall a great early 80’s horror film. It may have been better off without “Halloween” in its title, but its cult following is comprised largely of fans of the Halloween franchise in general.

The film’s box office and critical underperformance would lead to the end of the Halloween series, until 1988, when fans clamoring for the return of the original story would be rewarded. It’s almost a shame that this film was the one that put the end to the series for a while. A branch off into the Halloween-mythos anthology may have been interesting, but at the same time, we probably would have never returned to the Michael Myers saga, so I’ll take it.

Until next time, The Nightmare Isn't Over

Conal Cochran, reminding you to watch the big giveaway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Citan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
1,249
Reaction score
51
Points
48
Age
40
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
kurtangle
Favorite Wrestler
mickfoley
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Awesome!

When do you plan on posting the Halloween 4 review?
 

James Bond

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
243
Reaction score
25
Points
18
Age
33
Location
Wisconsin
Favorite Wrestler
shawnmichaels
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk5
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
It'll be up very soon. I'm working on screenshots at the moment. I hope it surprises everyone else the same way it surprised me. I can't believe its final score.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Citan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
1,249
Reaction score
51
Points
48
Age
40
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
kurtangle
Favorite Wrestler
mickfoley
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Halloween 4 is my favorite of the entire franchise, next to the original. So the score better be good, or I'll turn green. ;)
 

James Bond

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
243
Reaction score
25
Points
18
Age
33
Location
Wisconsin
Favorite Wrestler
shawnmichaels
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk5
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
except for your face, which will be pale, emotionless ....
 

Citan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
1,249
Reaction score
51
Points
48
Age
40
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
kurtangle
Favorite Wrestler
mickfoley
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles

James Bond

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
243
Reaction score
25
Points
18
Age
33
Location
Wisconsin
Favorite Wrestler
shawnmichaels
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk5
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
I believe mine included me being on the floor, unconscious. With puke next to me.
 

Citan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
1,249
Reaction score
51
Points
48
Age
40
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
kurtangle
Favorite Wrestler
mickfoley
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
I believe mine included me being on the floor, unconscious. With puke next to me.

LOL

What was your reaction after watching Zombieweens?
 

James Bond

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
243
Reaction score
25
Points
18
Age
33
Location
Wisconsin
Favorite Wrestler
shawnmichaels
Favorite Wrestler
edge
Favorite Wrestler
cmpunk5
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Favorite Wrestler
chrisjericho
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Let's not get into that now. I'd rather focus on Halloween 4!!! Zombie and Rosenthal will have their moments on the hot seat soon enough.
 

Citan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
1,249
Reaction score
51
Points
48
Age
40
Location
Canada
Favorite Wrestler
kurtangle
Favorite Wrestler
mickfoley
Favorite Wrestler
ajstyles
Good idea. :nodsmile:

Fuck Zombie and ROFLsenthal.

Not that Othenin Girard's any better...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Fuji Vice

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
25,302
Reaction score
775
Points
118
Age
45
Favorite Wrestler
stanhansen
Favorite Wrestler
brusierbrody
Favorite Wrestler
rickrude
Favorite Wrestler
randysavage
Halloween 2 is good, though I'm obviously going to say you overrated it since I can't fathom it being a 9/10, but that's just me. I wish they'd re-cut the film and added in a few of the television version scenes but overall its a good if not great sequel. It does its job and that's about all you can ask from a film with a 2 in the title.

As for Halloween III, I'm actually pretty impressed that you rated it as highly as you did, but glad, because its certainly worthy of such high praise. The obvious issue with "Halloween" being in the title and the film not featuring Myers was a glaring one, but then it was never advertised as a Myers film so I've never understood the backlash. Besides, as I wrote in my review of the film a long while ago, it exhibits many elements of a slasher film (and even the first two Halloween's for that matter) so there's no reason why people had to get butthurt.

Also, to your point of it mostly being Myers fans who make up the cult following, I'd actually argue that its the opposite. I have several friends who don't like the Myers films (don't ask why, its a long story) but love Halloween III. Even years back when I worked in the video store, I'd often come across people who preferred watching it to watching the Myers movies, so I do believe that it has just as much of a regular audience as it does a fanboy one.