I was thinking who shouldv'e been put over in certain matches in WWE.
Here are some of my examples.
1. Nexus at Summerslam - This was the starting point of Nexus failing.
2. Wade Barrett over Randy Orton - Survivor Series 2010. - Why not give Barrett a run with the title? Barrett couldv'e lost the belt back to Orton and Miz couldv'e cashed it the MIB. Then they wouldn't have had that stupid Cena fired storyline.
3. CM Punk over Randy Orton - Wrestlemania 27 or Extreme Rules - Orton winning both matches made no sense at all.
4. Alberto Del Rio over John Cena - Night of Champions 2011 - What was the point of Cena winning back the WWE Title?
5. Batista over John Cena - Wrestlemania 26. - Batista won the belt at Elimination Chamber then loses it back to Cena at WM. What was the point of this short reign for Batista? Cena beat Batista at the next two PPVs anyway, so what couldv'e hurt if Batista won at Wrestlemania?
6. Christian over Randy Orton at Over the Limit 2011 - Orton came into OTL as champion...Okay, then Orton beats him at C.Punishment, loses the belt to Christian at Money in the Bank and loses it back to Orton at Summerslam. What was the point of all this? Christian couldv'e had a nice run as champion and lose it back to Orton at Summerslam.
7. The Miz over Alex Riley - Yes, Alex Riley was just upcoming into his own. But this lost hurt Miz more than it helped Alex Riley.
8. Miz/R-Truth over John Cena/Rock - The storyline between Cena/Rock wouldv'e been better if either Rock or Cena cost the other one the match. Plus it wouldv'e helped build on Miz and R-Truth as heel threats.
9. Ziggler over Edge - Royal Rumble 2011. Ziggler had the belt for 5 minutes. Okay, its bullshit, but okay. If Edge was going to win the title back, why not have Ziggler win it at the Rumble and then lost at E.Chamber?
10. Cody Rhodes or Ted Dibiase over Randy Orton - Wrestlemania 26. Why couldn't Orton put one of them over and help build a new face?
I'm not sure if I can think of anything else..But post what ones that you know of.
Here are some of my examples.
1. Nexus at Summerslam - This was the starting point of Nexus failing.
2. Wade Barrett over Randy Orton - Survivor Series 2010. - Why not give Barrett a run with the title? Barrett couldv'e lost the belt back to Orton and Miz couldv'e cashed it the MIB. Then they wouldn't have had that stupid Cena fired storyline.
3. CM Punk over Randy Orton - Wrestlemania 27 or Extreme Rules - Orton winning both matches made no sense at all.
4. Alberto Del Rio over John Cena - Night of Champions 2011 - What was the point of Cena winning back the WWE Title?
5. Batista over John Cena - Wrestlemania 26. - Batista won the belt at Elimination Chamber then loses it back to Cena at WM. What was the point of this short reign for Batista? Cena beat Batista at the next two PPVs anyway, so what couldv'e hurt if Batista won at Wrestlemania?
6. Christian over Randy Orton at Over the Limit 2011 - Orton came into OTL as champion...Okay, then Orton beats him at C.Punishment, loses the belt to Christian at Money in the Bank and loses it back to Orton at Summerslam. What was the point of all this? Christian couldv'e had a nice run as champion and lose it back to Orton at Summerslam.
7. The Miz over Alex Riley - Yes, Alex Riley was just upcoming into his own. But this lost hurt Miz more than it helped Alex Riley.
8. Miz/R-Truth over John Cena/Rock - The storyline between Cena/Rock wouldv'e been better if either Rock or Cena cost the other one the match. Plus it wouldv'e helped build on Miz and R-Truth as heel threats.
9. Ziggler over Edge - Royal Rumble 2011. Ziggler had the belt for 5 minutes. Okay, its bullshit, but okay. If Edge was going to win the title back, why not have Ziggler win it at the Rumble and then lost at E.Chamber?
10. Cody Rhodes or Ted Dibiase over Randy Orton - Wrestlemania 26. Why couldn't Orton put one of them over and help build a new face?
I'm not sure if I can think of anything else..But post what ones that you know of.