- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Messages
- 383,775
- Reaction score
- 155,570
- Points
- 128
- Age
- 28
- Location
- Texas
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Wrestler
- Favorite Sports Team
- Favorite Sports Team
- Favorite Sports Team
- Favorite Sports Team
To me a debate is not acknowledging someone’s else’s point in every single response. It’s laying out your arguments over a couple of posts. All you guys need explicit acknowledgement otherwise you think I’m being a dick. I never said I think your argument about Tony not wanting Goldberg is wrong. I was just laying out my points about why I think he does want him. If you need me to say “I agree with your point but here’s what I think” before every single counter argument then fine.
It's when you directly quote people and say stuff like "you don't think Tony wants that Goldberg pop?" After we've laid out multiple reasons why he might not lol sounds like you're disregarding all those reasons bc you've already decided he does. Really no point in a debate then