Right but if you think mafia could quite easily control consensus to the point where you say you’ve done it really effectively before - why would you also think that mafia would be scared of a shot they can influence (much more than they can influence a night shot) and therefore basically have to kill him?
it kinda just struck me as setting him up to be lynched tomorrow
in fact, I’m a bit perturbed by why you would still be voting for him today, when you think he will die tonight if town, and therefore obvious scum if he’s alive tomorrow?
I said that they can, as in they have the ability to, but doesn’t mean that they always will. Of course they can influence it, or at least try to, but when RD is now out there saying that he’s not even going to necessarily listen to whatever consensus is decided, that whole side of the argument collapses in on itself. Do you see what I’m getting at?
Why would I still be voting him today? Not crossed your mind that he could just be making it up? Like I’ve said - it’s a hard and frankly stupid claim to fake as scum - but he panicked enough to make a claim after getting two votes. So I’m not ruling it out that he’s BSing his claim because it’s not confirmed until he actually takes the shot. I don’t doubt the claim, though, but the claim itself is not alignment-indicative and I’d be surprised if anyone could convincingly argue otherwise.
Like I have also already said, he could be town and mafia could be wanting to leave him alive tonight so he’s lynched tomorrow because we’d have to assume he was mafia if he didn’t get killed after making that claim.
RD could well be town, but I’m not going sit here and pretend that him claiming what he did, when he did, was good town play because it categorically wasn’t for multiple reasons that ive
well you conceded that you were playing reserved so I don’t have to take his word for it. I clocked what he said and thought I’d look to see what you did going forward as clearly he expects you to be more proactive. I don’t need to corroborate his opinion when you then come in and offer an excuse as to why you’re playing reserved (IE it’s a weekend, which is fair)
but then your actual posts are reserved too, which is different to just not being around.
You were talking about the meta of other dudes from your site lol.
At the time of me responding to Sayer’s initial posts, my posts up to that point had been reserved. I wasn’t trying to say anything to the contrary.
However since then, I’d disagree. I’ve been putting out a couple of reads and I’ve discussed this entire RD thing at length more than once. In fact, I’d hardly describe the post where I basically told him to back off and stop telling me how to play my game as reserved at all. Would you?
I’ve also been back through my posts and cannot see anywhere where I’ve talked about the meta of anyone else I’ve played with before, can you point these out? You may be confusing me with someone else.