Give me 5 reasons why Samoa Joe sucks

[phantomgerald]

His tights with one side black and the other side another color is boring me. Maybe he should wear yellow and pink tights and have a sign on the ass saying "Joes gonna kill you" now that would make him a lot more interesting.

 

[Rated RJC]

or "Joe's gonna kiss you" and team with Rico Constantino

 

[phantomgerald]

Yeah and change his finisher to grabbing the guy in a sleeper hold and planting a nice long one on him.

 

[Kennedy]

So he would be more intresting if it says something on his ASS, so you focuse on his ass in a wrestling match!!

 

[phantomgerald]

Erm yeah it makes him alot more colorful. :drinks_cheers:

 

[Mazz]

Joe is the second greatest wrestler currently in the whole damn world,right after Punk.

Say what you want,but even though Joe lacks mic skills,he has that "Im gonna fuck you up" charisma and he is probably the best 300 pounder ever.

 

[the dark knight]

^^you're an idiot.

punk and joe are no where near the top 10. both suck on the mic (yea i watched cm punk's promos from roh...still sucks) with the charisma of mark henry.

best 300 pounder? pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft

i can name 5 names right off the bat!

 

[Mazz]

^^you're an idiot.

punk and joe are no where near the top 10. both suck on the mic (yea i watched cm punk's promos from roh...still sucks) with the charisma of mark henry.

best 300 pounder? pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft

i can name 5 names right off the bat!

Alright,start naming some. And if Kane,Undertaker or any other WWE superstar over 300 pounds is on the list,your automatically a blueberry,because no WWE wrestler over 300 pounds at the moment can hold a candle to Joe. But yeah,the ever part was a mistake of mine,forgot about Bam Bam and Vader.

 

[the dark knight]

why not kane and taker again? last time i checked they were over 300 pounds.

compare these names to joe, decide who deserves a world title more:

taker
kane
khali (yes)
batista (yes)

ok, not 5. but why would he be the best in the world just cuz he's fat? its like the khali thing. best guy in the world cuz he's the best guy that comes from india.

 

[Mazz]

why not kane and taker again? last time i checked they were over 300 pounds.

compare these names to joe, decide who deserves a world title more:

taker
kane
khali (yes)
batista (yes)

ok, not 5. but why would he be the best in the world just cuz he's fat? its like the khali thing. best guy in the world cuz he's the best guy that comes from india.

Kane has sucked ever since he lost the mask. And basically,Kane never was a great in-ring talent. And Taker is just old. And really,Taker isnt a great in ring guy either. Seriously,if Taker and Kane wouldnt have the gimmicks they have,could you see them succeeding in wrestling like Joe?

And I can actually prove that Kane is a worse wrestler than Joe. Has Kane ever recieved a 5 star rated match? Huh? Taker has. Joe has.

Taker and Kane are both guys who were average or a bit above average wrestlers,who just happened to score a great gimmick which they milked like no tommorow,which is not a bad thing,but it sure as hell doesnt make them good wrestlers.

 

[Rated RJC]

Please explain how Joe is a better "wrestler" than Taker.

Angle/Taker > Angle/Joe

 

[Mazz]

Please explain how Joe is a better "wrestler" than Taker.

Angle/Taker > Angle/Joe

Thats cuz Angle is popping more pills now than he ever was.

And seriously,I've never seen Joe have a really bad match,but 70 % of Takers matches are bad. I can name like 5 right now. Taker only has great matches when he has fantastic opponents like Kurt Angle and Shawn Michaels,when as Joe can basically have a match with a broomstick and make it a 3 star match.

Dudleyz vs Taker at the GBA

Taker vs A-Train and Big Show

Taker vs Khali

Taker vs Batista

Taker vs JBL

Now Joe hasnt had one single bad match. Hell,Joe made Scott Steiner look good,which is like turning water into wine.

 

[Rated RJC]

All you did was use metaphors and avoid my actual question.

Why is Joe a better "wrestler" than Taker?

 

[the dark knight]

Kane has sucked ever since he lost the mask. And basically,Kane never was a great in-ring talent. And Taker is just old. And really,Taker isnt a great in ring guy either. Seriously,if Taker and Kane wouldnt have the gimmicks they have,could you see them succeeding in wrestling like Joe?

And I can actually prove that Kane is a worse wrestler than Joe. Has Kane ever recieved a 5 star rated match? Huh? Taker has. Joe has.

Taker and Kane are both guys who were average or a bit above average wrestlers,who just happened to score a great gimmick which they milked like no tommorow,which is not a bad thing,but it sure as hell doesnt make them good wrestlers.

kane 1998-2002 = 9/10
2002-losing the mask = 9.5/10
kane losing the mask - moving to smackdown = 8/10
kane smackdown - now = 7/10

joe - anytime = 5/10

1)why would you care much about ring skill?
2)the 5 star match joe had wasnt a single match
3)i judge by who entertainms me the most
4)if you really think that joe is better than taker then you should stop watching wrestling. joe is no where near taker in any aspect, not even ring skills. its not about how many headlocks you have...

 

[Rated RJC]

One more point I'd like to make

Deadman Taker Gimmick's mic skills are more entertaining to me than Joe's normal mic skills