Get ready for an IWC explosion, but Punk or Bryan?

[Pop Tatari]

career wise i say fire Bryan as he deserves better then what he is getting and i really don't see him amounting to much in wwe sadly.

 

[CM Punk]

 

[GeeTeaIye]

This is basically the "Who would you send to TNA" thread.

So I voted Bryan.

 

[Lockard 23]

"Barney kills himself" sounds like a funny pic, but it's not showing up.

 

[GeeTeaIye]

"Barney kills himself" sounds like a funny pic, but it's not showing up.

Spoiler: It's not the dinosaur.

 

[CM Punk]

Edited it, and not the dinosaur.

 

[Danielson]

Bryan Danielson is better, and it's not even close.

I'd fire Daniel Bryan and Hire the american dragon

 

[Lockard 23]

No purple dinosaur offing himself? Disappointing.

 

[BaraaKhalaf92]

Damn, Crayo you can't simply make such a thread. :why:
I would never vote for Punk to get fired, sorry Bryan.

 

[Crayo]

Bryan Danielson is better, and it's not even close.

I'd fire Daniel Bryan and Hire the american dragon

It's not close? Come on. Punk is miles ahead on the stick and is himself a very good wrestler (obviously not as good as Bryan). I would personally say a fantastic talker and great wrestler is a fantastic asset to have. Bryan is the BITW technically, but he isn't in Punk's league verbally. That in itself makes it close imo.

 

[seabs]

It's not close? Come on. Punk is miles ahead on the stick and is himself a very good wrestler (obviously not as good as Bryan). I would personally say a fantastic talker and great wrestler is a fantastic asset to have. Bryan is the BITW technically, but he isn't in Punk's league verbally. That in itself makes it close imo.

All Bryan has on Punk is crispness in ring and physical selling, Punk tells a better story, has better expressions with his face and body language plus he can sell a better psychological story.

Danielson gives you a great wrestling match while Punk gives you a big story.

It's annoying how underrated Punk is now due to his idiotic marks.

 

[Crayo]

All Bryan has on Punk is crispness in ring and physical selling, Punk tells a better story, has better expressions with his face and body language plus he can sell a better psychological story.

Danielson gives you a great wrestling match while Punk gives you a big story.

It's annoying how underrated Punk is now due to his idiotic marks.

I need to stop agreeing with you, but I can't here. This is the story of the IWC so far regarding Punk from what I have gathered:

- Was massively underrated
- Word got around that he was underrated, so he suddenly got a LOT of internet fans
- Was the IWC darling with Jericho
- FINALLY got his push that everyone was asking for
- Everyone loved it for a period, apart from a few haters
- It became cool to hate on him, so everyone did
- Now he's apparently overrated on a giant scale
- Cool to hate Punk now, you're a mark if you like him

It's a sad cycle that the IWC especially have (though it happens in everyday society too). At the moment he is hated by many (still loved by some), and it's cool to hate him. I can see it quickly turning into a "It's cool to like him again" type thing soon though. Meh.

 

[Lockard 23]

CM Punk is the best in the world.

 

[seabs]

CM Punk is the best in the world.

 

[Crayo]

CM Punk is the best in the world.

We're not there in the cycle yet. Currently we need to start making threads about how underrated he is, so everyone can like him again. THEN we can start going on about how he's the best in the world.

learn2cycle Kevin.