At the time, Warrior winning was absolutely the right choice. WWE just completely botched Warrior's run because they gave him zero convincing opponents.Canadian Dragon said:for what its worth, can I say, with 0 information or facts to back up my claim, Hogan should have beaten Warrior. fuck wARRIOR
yeah and Hogan DID put Warrior over... once again. The Hogan/Slaughter match was just whatever. It happened. At least Hogan didn't beat Warrior to get the title back. And if you think Earthqauke was deserving of such an honor then okay. I definitely don't think that but I'm not gonan fight about that too lolGrim Theft Auto said:1.) Hogan wasn't the top guy after 1990, because he went on hiatus following WrestleMania VI. For that year, it was Ultimate Warrior who was perceived as the guy. 2.) Hogan could have easily gotten his win back at WrestleMania VII instead of that awful Hogan/Slaughter match. 3.) Earthquake vs. Warrior at Royal Rumble 1991 would have been an excellent segue into Hogan/Earthquake, with the story being that Hogan has lost to this fucking monster who just beat the WWF Champion too in convincing fashion. The story is completely written for a David vs. Goliath match akin to Hogan/Andre.
lmaooooo I always forget this match happenedCody said:did my man triple h dirty at mania
for sure, I just dont care TODAY, lol. but also I legit thought Warrior was ass. wifey liked him thoGrim Theft Auto said:At the time, Warrior winning was absolutely the right choice. WWE just completely botched Warrior's run because they gave him zero convincing opponents.