Yeah you guys can debate that's fine lol just let me know when that's starting so I can go find people to talk to like normal humans instead of debate club, I've grown to enjoy it moreLightSabre said:
Nash, Hall, Hogan for me. I actually though Hall was better in WWE but thats mostly due to the substance abuse issuesBlaze said:
1.) Hogan wasn't the top guy after 1990, because he went on hiatus following WrestleMania VI. For that year, it was Ultimate Warrior who was perceived as the guy. 2.) Hogan could have easily gotten his win back at WrestleMania VII instead of that awful Hogan/Slaughter match. 3.) Earthquake vs. Warrior at Royal Rumble 1991 would have been an excellent segue into Hogan/Earthquake, with the story being that Hogan has lost to this fucking monster who just beat the WWF Champion too in convincing fashion. The story is completely written for a David vs. Goliath match akin to Hogan/Andre.LightSabre said:
No, idk what Deezy is talking about lol that's why I'm calling it a debate not an argument and it's still annoying to me (again not saying it's wrong, debate away)LightSabre said:
