General Chit-Chat Thread - No Spoilers

[Sky]

I know, but 97 is relevant if the idea is he can’t draw.

I never said he couldn't draw, I said he flopped in 1990 specifically

 

[Deezy]

Everyone knows tans = box office

 

[Chris]

I know, but 97 is relevant if the idea is he can’t draw.

It's not that he can't, it's just that he didn't during that time lol he did in 97 tho

 

[Deezy]

they had no choice but to keep the title on hot dog coloured Hogan

 

[Rosie]

His in ring shape or not, they built that storyline for over a year. Even if the match would have been shit, just have that moment then solve everything after. The botched finish hurt the storyline more than Sting's condition ever would unless he'd wrestle like Goldberg v Undertaker.

 

[Deezy]

No tan....get out of the business. This is just science.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

It's not that he can't, it's just that he didn't during that time lol he did in 97 tho

Fair, but he was so new at the time.

Maybe 2 years since they bought UWF?

 

[Sabretooth]

Is that the match where Sting kicked out after the three count then for some reason the match was restarted

 

[Deezy]

If Sting was tanned too much.....could he have been called out for wearing "white face"?

 

[Canadian Dragon]

huh

 

[Canadian Dragon]

thats a match ig

 

[Chris]

Fair, but he was so new at the time. Maybe 2 years since they bought UWF?

I'd just blame it on shit Jim Herd more than anything to do with Sting myself

 

[Canadian Dragon]

not sure if this the narrative id be controlling but get my paid my friends

 

[Sabretooth]

So no ones gonna answer my question. Classic.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

i have no idea sabs