General Chit-Chat Thread - No Spoilers

[Canadian Dragon]

IMO WWE doesn't know how to book a brand split. One company can't split half its roster and keep both shows interesting, Especially when he only knows one way to write a show.

yeah they tend to always stack one show or the other. and they only can really book 2 big angles tops at a time

 

[Canadian Dragon]

rest is generally rehash city

 

[Canadian Dragon]

i dont get why they even need a split when raw is 3 hours

 

[Canadian Dragon]

but wtv

 

[Kross Rhodes]

The OG split was only great for six months in my opinion. Then it was good for about 3 years. After that it tanked. And I feel like the second time around, they were jsut good for that first 6 months, and then tanked even faster and harder than the first time. Not even giving us 3 good years.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

yeah they tend to always stack one show or the other. and they only can really book 2 big angles tops at a time

I wouldn't even say either show is ever really stacked. WWE doesn't really have enough main eventers and top midcarders to split at all, unless one show is made to look like Heat.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

hmmm, perhaps. i guess it depends what you qualify as mid carders and top guys

 

[Canadian Dragon]

id agree they dont know how to book or build guys like that up though

 

[Canadian Dragon]

mostly due to their methods of putting the top of the line guys over

 

[Kross Rhodes]

I agree they stack and favor one over the other, always, though, but it's still not as good if they just dropped the split.

 

[Canadian Dragon]

i still think their main issue is the same as always

 

[Canadian Dragon]

they just cant book babybfaces to save their lives

 

[Canadian Dragon]

or they dont have anyone that can be a top babyface. i dunno

 

[Canadian Dragon]

im not sure how to fix it

 

[CakeWalker]

you wwe marks - need to stop polluting the shoutbox with your terrible promotion love